Lmao why are you explaining incredibly basic things even people outside of the US know and acting like you’re saying something incredible and knowledgeable?
This is literally primary school content for 11 year olds. How old are you @spaceghoti ? Why on earth do you think this is notable or worth raising and act like it’s something everyone hasn’t already heard before?
Have you read the Federalist Papers? Specifically number 10.
Honestly this all sounds like arbitrary shit someone made up without proper justification or consideration.
All forms of goverment have checks and balances. How is this special?
All forms of goverment are a way to achive consensus amongst the rulling class. How is this different?
Why is this separation of powers the ideal one?
Why separate the legislative and the judiciary when there is a rich tradition of common law?
Why cant the executive act by commitie or in a decentralized way?
Are these “powers” actually autonomus or arbitrary constructions dependent on other institutions to act?
Why are these considered the central responsabilities of the state? Why cant the legislature and the judiciary be separate from the state like in the abassid era?
This is literally just bait and has no place in this community. Moderators should delete this on that grounds alone.
If it’s allowed, then I wouldn’t begrudge any Hexbear user(s) from spamming the comm with random political theory posts, especially those of the communist variety
Yeah everyone should have that right, but I don’t think it does anyone any favors to allow these type of posts on this comm.
It’s one thing to invite dunking on yourself in the comments section of a topical post. It’s another to create posts just for the sake of stoking inter instance drama in a comm not made for that.
Yeah that’s true on the one hand, but on the other, I would leave it up just for accountability. It is about politics in every way, even if it has a meta nature.
Plus by leaving it up they get to show their ass and it invites people to come and explain how they are wrong.
Especially considering the poster doesn’t seem to have any interest in either explaining or defending what it’s supposed to mean. Like, I enjoy talking about politics as much as the next person but it doesn’t look like OP wants to discuss anything.
Why is an electoral system where 2/3 of the house is unelected and the third branch is indirectly elected via an electoral college seen as democratic?
Like, I live in the UK so I can’t really talk about antidemocratic systems gestures at the lords, but this doesn’t seem like a system that allows for a person’s vote to be worth much.
law.cornell.edu
Hot