Draft demands for a marriage strike ( kbin.social )

Theimportanceofbeingnice , 11 months ago

Pretty good!

Number 14 is a bit excessive. If you make a decision together with someone to have a child, you shouldn't have the ability to back down when it's too late to abort.

17 on the other hand doesn't go far enough in my opinion.There should be a right to be informed of a pregnancy before the abortion delay is up.

Finally, there should be something about neutrality of child related services (social services, psych evalutaio experts...). They are overwhelimingly female, and in my experiences extremely biased.

About allegations and alienation: allgations of abuse are the nuclear weapon of parental alienation because of the necessary protection of children. If one parent is suspected of abuse, the child should rightfully be protected while light is made on the affair. That means a child cut off from the accused parent, znd left alone with the allegator. However, parental alienation being abuse, whenever such an accusation is made, the child should be protected as a precaution from both parents, since one is a potential abuser in whatever way was alleged, and the other being a potential abuser as the allgations may be false, and therefore alienation.

This would necessitate faster, more diligent proceedings and stronger, better funded child protection services, but that's already much needed anyway.

rikersbeard OP , 11 months ago

14. is supposed to refer to “paper abortions” but I guess I didn’t phrase it very clearly.

Good point about the bias in family services. I wonder what could be done in terms of policy, aside from offering scholarships for men to get degrees in social work.