Olgratin_Magmatoe , 10 months ago (edited 10 months ago) You’ve just eliminated perhaps the safest, most attainable method for the average person to achieve passive income. If the “safest most attainable way” to get wealth requires others to be homeless or unable to afford a basic necessity then it isn’t not worth it. And it arguably isn’t the most attainable way, because so many people are being priced out of owning a home because of the current system’s failures. Other than living on it, why would someone want to own land? To use it for a business or enjoyment. I’m not sure where you are going with this.
You’ve just eliminated perhaps the safest, most attainable method for the average person to achieve passive income.
If the “safest most attainable way” to get wealth requires others to be homeless or unable to afford a basic necessity then it isn’t not worth it.
And it arguably isn’t the most attainable way, because so many people are being priced out of owning a home because of the current system’s failures.
Other than living on it, why would someone want to own land?
To use it for a business or enjoyment. I’m not sure where you are going with this.