Landlords should have to pay income tax on their rental properties regardless of whether they're rented out or not. ( gothamist.com )

bigschnitz , 10 months ago

So a less efficient and more complicated land tax? Is there any benefit to this compared to just taxing based on the value?

GreyEyedGhost , 10 months ago

The idea is to make it financially uncomfortable to retain real estate in a manner that harms society.

Pipoca , 10 months ago

That’s literally what a land value tax does.

GreyEyedGhost , 10 months ago

For as long as I’ve been alive, one of the lines I’ve heard is that real estate is always a sound investment. There have also been land taxes for that entire time, most of them being land value taxes. The evidence suggests that the most common form of land value tax, which does not consider how many residential properties an entity owns, is not doing much, if anything, to disincentivize purchasing residential properties as an investment.

Pipoca , 10 months ago

Land value taxes are quite rare in the US.

A property tax and a land value tax are a bit different: a land value tax taxes the unimproved value of a plot, while a property tax taxes the total value, including the assessed value of the buildings on the land.

One effect of property taxes is that a parking lot downtown pays a fraction of what an apartment building next door pays. With a land value tax, they pay the same, which discourages land speculation by encouraging efficient uses of land.

And we’ve certainly never gone as far as Georgism, which suggests a land value tax as the main or only source of government funding, set to be around what an unimproved lot on the same location would lease for.