You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

despotic_machine ,
@despotic_machine@lemmy.world avatar

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • possiblylinux127 OP ,
    @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip avatar

    That project seems much smaller and isn’t doing the same thing

    despotic_machine ,
    @despotic_machine@lemmy.world avatar

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • PropaGandalf ,
    @PropaGandalf@lemmy.world avatar

    Well Idk but they are always talking about a network for apps. But what I want to see is a decentralized storage. Nothing less nothing more. Thats what IPFS is supposed to be. What other build on top is a whole different story. I think we should put our efforts together instead of trying to reinvent the weel.

    despotic_machine , (edited )
    @despotic_machine@lemmy.world avatar

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • PropaGandalf ,
    @PropaGandalf@lemmy.world avatar

    Ok this sounds a lot better now. As you explained it Vailid can also be used for storage purposes only? Like a distributed public file storage? And if apps can access this storage this is more than welcome. But I’m more concerned about the foundation.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines