You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.
Return
HubertManne , 11 days ago I always took pascals wager as just being about some nebulous creator type of thing with no real specifics because the argument can't really handle specifics.
I always took pascals wager as just being about some nebulous creator type of thing with no real specifics because the argument can't really handle specifics.
stinerman , 11 days ago It was specifically about the Christian God because all others were "obviously" incorrect. It's terrible logic because it discounts: God somehow doesn't know you're believing in him "just in case" rather than because of actual faith. The wager implies that you should be an adherent of the religion that gets you the most stuff in the afterlife.
It was specifically about the Christian God because all others were "obviously" incorrect. It's terrible logic because it discounts:
HubertManne , 11 days ago ooh I like point 2. i have a new question now for thiests. well ya know allahs offering me a harem of 72 comely virgins. whats your offer?
ooh I like point 2. i have a new question now for thiests. well ya know allahs offering me a harem of 72 comely virgins. whats your offer?
hperrin , 11 days ago 72 sluts.
72 sluts.
HubertManne , 10 days ago im listening.
im listening.
hikaru755 , 10 days ago the religion that gets you the most stuff in the afterlife. I think it would be rather the opposite, should be the one that promises the worst fate in the afterlife to non-believers
the religion that gets you the most stuff in the afterlife.
I think it would be rather the opposite, should be the one that promises the worst fate in the afterlife to non-believers