rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

With a heat wave shattering temperature records across the country, let me just say that history will not look fondly on those who put fossil fuel profits above saving the planet.

jeremy_pm ,
@jeremy_pm@mastodon.nz avatar

@rbreich

All I know is will not be at all troubled by the existential fate of

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Climate damages by 2050 will be 6 times the cost of limiting warming to 2°

Study tracks the past costs of climate events and projects them into the future.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/04/climate-damages-by-2050-will-be-6-times-the-cost-of-limiting-warming-to-2/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

v4169sgr ,
@v4169sgr@mastodon.green avatar

@arstechnica

We may think its obvious; that all we need to do is explain the right way then everyone will do the right thing.

But if it is clear that this strategy isn't working well enough, then doesn't that suggest that we are asking the wrong question?

https://vocal.media/earth/carpe-diem-yr1qr40u5y

Yet all this seems rather nebulous, distant. If my home is cold and I cannot afford it, doesn't growing peat bogs seem like a ridiculously unaffordable luxury? What value are a few insects and butterflies to me when I cannot keep warm? Why should I care about future years and generations when my need is here and now? Who are these faceless bureaucrats and obscure scientists to tell me my business anyway. And Dublin does seem far away ...
ALT
  • Reply
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • All magazines
    •