feddit.it

raoul , to Photography in Villa Bellini (Catania, Italy)

I love the composition: the eyes naturally climb these stairs.

super_user_do OP ,
@super_user_do@feddit.it avatar

Thanks!

What_the_vent_meant , to homelab in My opnsense router has bad performance

An i5-6500T doesn’t feel underpowered to me unless you’ve got IPS + IDS and/or OpenVPN running. Is anything firing off a bunch of errors in the logs?

Moonrise2473 OP ,

in the logs i have a lot of " Block private networks from WAN" - it might be that i misconfigured everything with LAN and WAN in the same subnet

MangoPenguin , to homelab in My opnsense router has bad performance
@MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Are you running WAN and LAN on the same subnet connected to the same gateway?? That’s going to cause all kinds of weird issues. You can change LAN to a unique subnet instead.

i5-6500T can handle way more than gigabit throughput.

Moonrise2473 OP ,

yes in my inexperienced mind it seemed a great idea as it had a “failover” router

MangoPenguin ,
@MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

You can still do the setup nearly the same, but you’ll need to change the opnsense LAN to its own unique subnet, and put PC2 on that subnet with a manual IP setup.

Make sure you don’t enable DHCP on opnsense too, since that will really interfere with the existing router.

The only real downside to this, is PC2 traffic to access PC1 or other devices on the main router, will have to go through opnsense and you’ll need firewall rules for that.

Moonrise2473 OP ,

After you mentioned that I checked now and in opnsense DHCP leases they’re all in wan and not in LAN

LOL what I mess I created…

veroxii , to homelab in My opnsense router has bad performance

Your diagram is weird. Isn’t the opnsense box supposed to replace the router. Or at least it should be between the existing router and you clients. Pc 1 go to opnsense Lan. And opnsense wan to the router and internet.

You’re creating all kinds of loops which is generally a bad idea. Your data should flow in 1 direction like a tree.

Unless there are a lot of details you’re not sharing.

Also remember generally a router is not a switch. Plug all your PCs into a switch. Plug a wifi access point into the switch. And then have the switch go into the lan of your opnsense.

And then have the wan go out to the internet.

Moonrise2473 OP ,

i had the idea that two gateways could work in the same network without issues… in my inexperience i tried it with three hosts on an hyperv virtual network and it worked.

my stupid idea it’s like this:

  • main router 192.168.1.1
  • opnsense LAN connected to a switch on router LAN1 192.168.1.254
  • opnsense WAN 192.168.1.2 (still on the switch on the router LAN2)
  • pc1 static IP address 192.168.1.3 with main router as gateway and this works
  • PC2 DHCP assigned by opnsense in a pool from 192.168.1.50 to 192.168.1.100 with opnsense 192.168.1.254 as gateway

why i do this? To have a “temporary” setup where i slowly move all the static ip addresses to opnsense and in this way everything can have a valid configuration

veroxii ,

You can still do this but as others have said you need to have 2 separate lans. Your old Lan can go to PC 1 from old router. Then opnsense wan goes to your existing Lan and importantly you are now creating a new Lan on the lan side of opnsense. Here you can connect the PC 2 to test with. Each PC should only be on 1 Lan and each Lan should have a separate subnet.

See this post and the last comment even references a diagram to exactly what you want: forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=32774.0

There are all kinds of routing protocols and algorithms at play which don’t like loops and multiple routers competing to control the same subnet.

fxt_ryknow , to homelab in My opnsense router has bad performance

Is that diagram right?!

Moonrise2473 OP ,

Unfortunately yes, my inexperience let me put two gateways on the same subnet

I need to rethink it

penquin , to KDE in How to hide this
@penquin@lemm.ee avatar

Where is this?

dinckelman ,

This watermark is only present in the pre-release versions of Plasma. Once 6.0 gets released next week, it will go away as soon as you update

penquin ,
@penquin@lemm.ee avatar

Ok, hope OP finds this useful then. I suspected that’s what it was, but wanted to make sure with op

Joseph_Boom OP ,

Well, so at this point I’ll wait the stable release, thanks.

pelya , to KDE in How to hide this

Simply visit bugs.kde.org and report an issue that you have a watermark in the corner of the screen

frogmint , to KDE in How to hide this

Wait a few days

DeeBeeDouble , to KDE in How to hide this
@DeeBeeDouble@lemmy.ml avatar

Just add HideDesktopPreviewBanner=true to the [General] section in the ~/.config/kdeglobals file and restart plasmashell with systemctl restart --user plasma-plasmashell.service or just log out and back in.

Bro666 Mod ,
@Bro666@lemmy.kde.social avatar

👆 Correct answer!

Joseph_Boom OP ,

Thanks

tubbadu , to KDE in How to hide this

Go to settings to activate KDE

mokazemi ,
@mokazemi@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

You also need a license key XD

DavidGarcia , to KDE in How to hide this

tape it over

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines