Because numbers are becoming so large its almost pointless to think about. The national debt for example is 33 trillion dollars. That is an unimaginable sum. What even is 33 trillion dollars?
Is this a problem, though? There’s currencies like the Yen which have high numbers, the users just adjust their mindset of how much is “a lot”. Reducing the numbers wouldn’t change the problems of things getting more expensive. This feels like treating a very cosmetic symptom of a much larger problem.
The wealthy would still possess an obscene and unfathomable amount of wealth and the impoverished would still be struggling to get by, just the numbers would be smaller. Does that help anything?
Don’t get me wrong, I’d much rather be paying $266 in rent, though if I’m making one third of what I do now, I’m still in the same spot, just… with smaller numbers.
Right, as I said, it is definitely more psychological than actually helpful, but it would definitely feel a lot better to see smaller numbers. Hell, the national debt is even hard to write. 33,000,000,000,000
But the national debt is irrelevant to me. It has zero impact on my day to day life. It’s just some imaginary number pundits can shout about to push their utterly disconnected agendas.
Even if I could wrap my head around it, that wouldn’t improve the credit rating of the nation, even if I could manage to care one iota about that.
I’m sorry, I’m just struggling to understand why it’s useful to have a national debt that’s a small enough number for me to visualize some quantification of it.
Sorry, I don’t think I follow as to why that’s bad. If I pay, say, $1,000 in rent and earn $3,000 a month, it’s the same thing as if I paid $10,000 in rent and made $30,000 a month.
While I can see how those numbers could be reduced into smaller numbers easily, I’m not sure I understand why that is beneficial. My material conditions don’t change.
Your rent could be 200,000* units per month. So it’s basically a factor of 100, but for cents instead of dollars.
Yet shopping was still a whole lot easier because if the price said 1000₩, you paid 1000₩, no questions asked. Unlike in the US, where your $1.00 coffee gets $0.10 added for tax, $0.25 added for the tip, so even though the menu says $1.00, the actual cost to the customer is $1.35.
The problem isn’t that the numbers are big. The problem is that you’re trying to think about national numbers from the perspective of an individual.
500 miles might not be far for a pilot, but it would be for a jogger. We don’t need to shorten the units to make it easier for the jogger to understand 500 miles. (0.5 kilomiles! Lol)
*EDIT: Fixed the scale. I’ve been working with Japanese Yen which is a factor of 10, but KRW is a factor of 100 like I said…but mathed wrong. Lol
Right, but I figure that making, say, the national debt, at least somewhat more understandable to the average individual, would, at least hopefully, make the average individual hold the government accountable for absolutely uncontrollable spending. as is people just don’t care because the numbers are so unfathomable that they are like fuck it
I think this is a different issue than big numbers.
I have zero mechanisms available to me to reign in national spending anyway. If the debt were $10 dollars, that’d still be the case. But even if I did, the national debt doesn’t affect me in the slightest, why should I care if it’s $10 or $10T?
Fair. Eventually the us will enter a debt spiral and the average person will be living on the street eating 1 meal a day and shooting politicians for fucking everything up. However, just revaluing the currency does not solve that problem. That is a bigger, more systemic issue.
You do realize if you cut all dollar values to be 1/3 of the original value, the national debt becomes:
33 trillion * 1/3 = 11 trillion
This number is still unimaginably large, no?
I really wouldn’t worry about the debt. All nations have debt, and I bet the USAs debit-to-gdp ratio isn’t that bad (been a while since I paid attention to those numbers though).
Debt to gdp ratio is probably pretty average in comparison to other nations (admittedly this is a figure I have not looked up in a while). The yardstick we should use to measure how bad our debts are should be other economies. Government debt is nothing like the debt of private citizens.
I haven’t looked up what other countries debt to GDP ratios are, but if they are similar, at say, 150% then won’t we just end up in a scenario where the entire world crashes and burns and the average citizens all over the world are put out onto the streets? To my knowledge, the crazy circus can’t go on forever.
No, that only happens if countries stop being able to make good on their loans. To my knowledge most USA debt is owned by USA citizens and corporations in the form of bonds. Nations aren’t just loaning each ofher money they don’t have.
But the United States is getting to a point where they will not be able to make good on their loans unless they print more money, which will then cause inflation and make the dollars they repay the loan with worth less to the person/company/country who made the loan. We already pay more on our debt than we spend on the military and considering the US cannot stay out of other people’s business, that’s saying something.
But the United States is getting to a point where they will not be able to make good on their loans unless they print more money,
I’m sorry but to convince me you’d have to find a VERY good source for that claim. Government bonds are the safest bet in the game for a reason. The situation you’re describing would be a global collapse of most economies.
Anyway, you seem very interested in this topic, I hope you find the answers you’re looking for, but I think that wraps this conversation up for me.