You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

IMALlama , (edited )

As others have hit on already, sensor size is the thing holding you back. Bigger image circles require more glass to resolve. The most compact FF e-mount option I'm aware of is Zony 35mm f2.8

Here's a quick size rundown. The zFc is very classic looking, so I included it. Had a n APS-C and is wearing a FF lens though. Next up is your A7c with the previously mentioned lens, followed by a fairly compact micro four thirds body and then the Nikon J5.

https://pxlmag.com/db/camera-size-comparison/2cb6d89c_adc2b2b6-feb6b053_6154c3c3-7d9a7715_4b7de3da-5b91e20c_6a9c3a33-t60

If you want compact and don't mind wider lenses, micro four thirds bodies are probably your best option. The OM-5 is a modern gripless body.

jeena OP ,
@jeena@jemmy.jeena.net avatar

Yeah damn, ok then it doesn't make sense for my FF camera, especially because I also already have the 35mm 1.8

IMALlama ,

I'm a fellow FF Sony shooter and have found myself very fond of the 35mm focal length for a walk-around lens with my kids. My 35mm is Sigma's F1.4 DG HSM, which comes in at 775 grams and is fairly large at 77mm x 120mm. I've found myself grabbing my Sony FE 50mm f1.8 due to its much more compact size and weight, so I'm strongly considering a slower, but more compact 35mm to grab when I'll be outdoors.

I don't know if this is the case for you, but I am actively choosing my gear around gear I'll be more likely to use - even if this comes comes with some trade-offs in terms of IQ or aperture speed. My gear blows a cellphone out of the water for my hyperactive kids, but as they say the best camera in the world is the one you're carrying.

Something to think about.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines