You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

borkcorkedforks ,

It's going to be appealed and struck down. The judge's reasoning is just incorrect.

There is no tradition of regulating "uniquely dangerous features". Capacities over 15 rounds aren't even "uniquely dangerous" and are in common use.

Having a license/requirements just for ownership presents a number of problems. How many other rights do you need to take a test for? Here there isn't really a plan nor funding. The cops are supposed to handle it, somehow, but it's questionable if it will actually be shall issue. I very much expect the process to have the same problems as 'may issue' carry permits.

I almost wonder if the judge made a this shitty of a ruling just to get it to the supreme court.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines