The United States spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined ( climatejustice.social )

PinkPanther , 7 months ago

And yet, they keep losing more than winning. Unless you got stocks in weapons…

li10 , 7 months ago

Losing more than winning?

Not saying it’s right or worth the disproportionate investment, but the true value is the threat they pose keeps other countries in line (to a degree), winning the battle before it starts.

e_t_ Admin , 7 months ago

If you win a conflict decisively, then the conflict is over and weapon sales dry up. Continuous, low-level, indecisive battles are what keep the weapon dealers in business.

Speculater , 7 months ago

Maybe we should start marketing it different like Republicans did in an attempt to privatize the mail system.

“U.S. military loses $877B annually!”

BB69 , 7 months ago

Ah yes, the epic fail of Ukraine being able to not collapse due to American equipment propping up the armed forces against Russia.

Situations like this is why the budget is so high.

Perfide , 7 months ago

Funding to Ukraine has all been additional funding approved by congress, it didn’t come from our defense budget…

papertowels , 7 months ago

I’d argue that the additional funding has allowed the US to leverage the investments they’ve previously paid for in their regular budget to help Ukraine.

You cannot throw the money congress has budgeted for Ukraine at a vacuum to get nearly as much support - you need the logistics of a ready to go military industrial complex that everyone loves to hate.

BB69 , 7 months ago

Aid given to Ukraine has mainly been material the US already has. We aren’t building new weapons for them. The dollars on the aid packages is the value of the equipment.