You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

AlexisFR , (edited )
@AlexisFR@jlai.lu avatar

I don’t think it’s relevant to make more 32st century content.

And, isn’t Star Trek: Legacy already supposed to be the “next next generation” sequel?

ValueSubtracted OP Mod ,
@ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

“Legacy” is an imaginary show. It’s never been put into development, and there’s no indication that will change.

AlexisFR ,
@AlexisFR@jlai.lu avatar

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

    •
    ValueSubtracted OP Mod ,
    @ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

    I’m not the one to ask.

    AlexisFR ,
    @AlexisFR@jlai.lu avatar

    [Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

    •
    ValueSubtracted OP Mod ,
    @ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

    None of that is true.

    littlebluespark ,
    @littlebluespark@lemmy.world avatar

    Is weed legal where you are? Seems plentiful.

    sanzky ,

    S31 was repurposed into a movie but it was on development for some time. Legacy was just wishful thinking by Terry Matalas.

    IMHO Picard should have ended with an USS Picard instead of a new Enterprise. It was clearly just a hook from Matalas trying to get a new show

    chahk ,

    Please. They don’t tease a new show by accident, or on the hopes alone. They also don’t increment the Enterprise letter without some solid buy-in from the network. Legacy is happening.

    ValueSubtracted OP Mod , (edited )
    @ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

    Literally no one but Terry Matalas has “teased” anything, and he’s been very open about the fact that there’s no movement whatsoever on it becoming a reality.

    littlebluespark ,
    @littlebluespark@lemmy.world avatar

    Where’s 32nd St?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines
    •