You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

ghariksforge , (edited )

Another dinosaur from the past century resisting 21th21st century.

Semi-Hemi-Demigod ,
@Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

Twenty-oneth century

kat_angstrom ,

I think it’s pronounced, “twenty-firth century”

floofloof ,

“twenty-firth thentury”

FTFY

ccunix ,

That’s what Mike Tyson calls it, so who are we to argue?

Jaysyn ,
@Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar

Meanwhile, back in reality, my company isn't upside down on commercial real estate & likes making more money so we are getting a smaller office to house our servers & equipment.

some_guy ,

My company did the same. We had a six week assessment period where everyone was required to come in two days per week. Once that data showed no major difference in output, we got a smaller office (for receiving and such) and everyone was told the office is optional. Smart business that kept people happy.

HubertManne ,
@HubertManne@kbin.social avatar

Mine was a bit hesitant but they are now talking seriously about getting rid of more offices and they had done one pass on that before. I would sorta like them to have an office subscription

circuitfarmer ,
@circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

This right here.

Find me a company deeply invested in office real estate (in particular, expecting a return on that real estate), and I’ll show you a company against remote work.

The real detriments don’t exist. True, I have met workers that don’t like remote work: companies have latched on to those people as an excuse to continue what is otherwise an entirely transparent narrative.

If anything I gain productivity by working from home. I see companies that don’t support that kind of work as entirely being behind the curve.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines
    •