I’m all for hybrid work models, but this reporting smells fishy: why don’t they mention the contrasting scores for companies not enforcing return to office? If they were markedly different, wouldn’t you want to underscore that? The author then going on a self-promotion spree for his hybrid work consultancy does not inspire confidence in the findings either …
As much as I love hybrid work myself, this style of lazy and frankly biased reporting only serves to undermine confidence in actual success stories. Say no to lazy “journalism”.