Cyberflunk

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

That’s not the experience we give. What you describe sounds bad.

  • candidate gets an email explain company and position in about 3 paragraphs, along with responsibilities and skill we’re looking for.
  • offers a short 3 minute video explaining company and role.
  • offers a one way interview to introduce themselves, and describe relevant skills or other anecdotes about themselves.
  • every candidate receives a phone call
  • promoted candidates get f2f (video chat) interview.

So yeah. Perhaps not optimal, but it helps us hire more effectively, and we can process twice {roughly} as many candidates

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

Thanks

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

I didn’t say waste, and my job is managing and engineering. If I were in HR maybe. Even if I were a hiring manager, it’s still a lot of time into finding resources, and anyone in that situation gets frustrated.

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

It’s not the only interview. Jeez. It’s a tool to screen. There’s still interviews.

Cyberflunk , to Texas in Texas teacher fired for reading Diary of Anne Frank to class.

Sue everyone.

Burn it all down.

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

What’s Cord?

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

It’s really hard to say. Generative AI can pump out unlimited resumes and fake human data to make everything look real. I don’t know of a service that screens candidates or vets them to make sure they an actual human. It’s kinda tinfoil hat to think hiring agencies are flooding the market with fake, so that people like me will just give up; but… i mean… maybe?

Cyberflunk , to Work Reform in there is Indeed a problem

I hire in technology. I can easily spend weeks filling a position. Candidates lie through their resumes and interviews 20 wasted interviews = 30 hours cultivating those interviews I have about a 26% no show, no response to missed interviews. Posting a job equals literally hundreds of emails, recruiters, off shore companies, and badly done resumes.

Headhunters talk big and deliver bottom barrel candidates, no one likes recruiters, so great candidates hardly use them.

When I use tools like one way interviews so I can screen hundreds of candidates, the feedback is “it’s not personal enough”, then no show on an appointment THEY MAKE

I’m a small business, my resources for hiring aren’t extensive.

Just want to give some flavor to the other side of this.

Cyberflunk , to Personal Finance in (US) Introducing Comingle: An opt-in UBI (Universal Basic Income) to provide a stable weekly income based upon users contributing 7% of their income

This company isn’t even listed on crunchbase. No idea who founders are, investors, banks involved.

There needs to be a fuckload more transparency here.

Cyberflunk , to Personal Finance in (US) Introducing Comingle: An opt-in UBI (Universal Basic Income) to provide a stable weekly income based upon users contributing 7% of their income

Are you involved in this company? If not, wasn’t aimed at you.

Cyberflunk , to Personal Finance in (US) Introducing Comingle: An opt-in UBI (Universal Basic Income) to provide a stable weekly income based upon users contributing 7% of their income

Nice try tech bro. “Oh, we got hacked, whoopsie.”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines