Honestly this all sounds like arbitrary shit someone made up without proper justification or consideration.
All forms of goverment have checks and balances. How is this special?
All forms of goverment are a way to achive consensus amongst the rulling class. How is this different?
Why is this separation of powers the ideal one?
Why separate the legislative and the judiciary when there is a rich tradition of common law?
Why cant the executive act by commitie or in a decentralized way?
Are these “powers” actually autonomus or arbitrary constructions dependent on other institutions to act?
Why are these considered the central responsabilities of the state? Why cant the legislature and the judiciary be separate from the state like in the abassid era?
The idea is that if similar senteces were given to similar protests in north korea or iran or russia etc. There would be huge outrage in the mainstream press calling them authoritarian and totalitarian and so on.
that those countries are not nearly as bad as the us.