@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

SnotFlickerman

@[email protected]

Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

SnotFlickerman ,
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I think you might need to read A Modest Proposal.

The thing is, giving women the ability to extricate themselves from bad relationships where they explicitly have to rely on the income of someone else to take care of themselves and their offspring is a big reason why violence against women persists.

When we’re talking “violence against women” we don’t mean women randomly attacked in the street, more often than not, we mean women attacked by their partners, who are mostly men.

The impact of being able to financially extricate yourself from a violent partner is huge and is driven by economics. It’s literally why Lenin considered women an equal part of the Communist struggle. It’s why Russia under the USSR initially legalized abortion in 1920. This would unfortunately change when Stalin came to power, but at the outset, it was understood that women having economic independence was a huge part of allowing them to become equals to men in society, and allowing them to escape abusive men.

While A Modest Proposal shouldn’t be taken with any seriousness, it’s jokey demeanor makes very good points about the same ideas. There are all kinds of things you can do economically to incentivize reduced violence towards women.

The idea that higher pay wouldn’t have an impact on reducing violence towards women seems a bit short-sighted.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines