I take it the Texas tax payers would be footing the bill? If so then there is no risk (ha!) to Paxton to pursue this. Only political gain even if Texas loses.
Strange headline. This is a justice department and foreign relations problem that really doesn’t rise to the level of a president problem.
A telling few lines:
Insider: I’m not sure Biden is personally hellbent on revenge. If Biden were to do what you wanted, he’d get hell from a large group of people who he has to work with every day.
Shipton: I’m convinced that the constituency that is against his prosecution is much larger.
I suspect this is all part of Trump’s goal to rile up his base. He’ll cancel and then claim the “deep state” somehow made him. His idiotic base will eat it up without questioning.
Anybody from the “law and order” party want to defend this shit head?
"charges Trump, De Oliveira and Nauta with two new obstruction counts based on allegations that they instructed an unnamed, fourth worker to delete surveillance video footage at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence last summer “to prevent the footage from being provided to a federal grand jury.” "
Not really. ACH is more of a protocol for non-realtime payments. This is for realtime. While there is a fed ACH the largest ACH provider in the US is The Clearing House LLC. Which, as the name suggests, is a private company.