lennivelkant

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

lennivelkant , to xkcd in xkcd #2954: Bracket Symbols

I know you're memeing, but if I know my Lisp, just wrapping something in triple parens implies evaluating it three times. So you have an expression evaluating to a producer that produces another producer that finally produces a value?

I'm sure there's a legit use case for it. I just can't think of one.

lennivelkant , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching

And what range can that sum cover?

lennivelkant , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching

Pretty sure "People who know enough about SQL to know about variables" is a subset of "People who know enough about SQL to be pedantic about it" :p

lennivelkant , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching

What is 4d as a numeric format prefix? I only know 0b and 0x. Is it some 4-24 system?

lennivelkant , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching

I sure wouldn't want him as an INNER JOIN

lennivelkant , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching

That's (part of) why it should be a separate table to map the relation "Relationship". People can have more than one (polyamory, infidelity), and you could track fields like the start, end, status (e.g. flirting, dating, committed, engaged, married, ended) in there.

lennivelkant , to LinkedinLunatics in Belching

Good point.

Should be age > (@my_age / 2) +7

FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query.

More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query my_age from that table too.

lennivelkant , to Do It Yourself in Things you can ruin to realize it didn't make sense to DIY

Me no word good 😄
Nah, you've got a point, my brain is just fried these days. I definitely need a vacation.

lennivelkant , to Do It Yourself in Things you can ruin to realize it didn't make sense to DIY

I was supporting your point. I forget that comments are seen as counterargument by default.

But you're right, my comment would have been more useful in reply to the other person.

lennivelkant , to Do It Yourself in Things you can ruin to realize it didn't make sense to DIY

Reduce
Reuse <- You are here
Recycle

Not using it at all would be better, sure, but if you don't have that option for whatever reason, reusing it is the next best thing. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines