Active

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

The argument against regulation is always the same: “It stifles growth and jobs.”

But just as tax cuts for corporations have not trickled down, regulatory cuts have not benefited most people.

Big companies enjoy bigger profits. Working people bear the costs.

aadriasola ,
@aadriasola@ruby.social avatar

@rbreich growth like the crypto scammer space, jobs like online trolls payed with crypto

davidhaynz ,
@davidhaynz@mastodon.nz avatar

@rbreich
The economist Warren J Samuels argued the lack of regulation, or deregulation, was in itself a form of regulation.

Because regulation controls the distribution of sacrifice. E.g. if you deregulate air pollution you shift costs from polluters to people who breathe.

I suppose there could be Kafkaesque regulations that don't affect the distribution of sacrifice, or do anything useful. But I would need convincing.

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

Trump’s tax law cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.

What did corporations do with the money saved?

They didn’t invest it or raise wages.

They spent a record $1 trillion on stock buybacks the year after the law went into effect.

Nothing trickled down to workers.

GhostOnTheHalfShell ,
@GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai avatar

@rbreich The less they are taxed, the more money is left (for them) in the economy. If the right wing complains of inflation, then the solution is to TAX the rich.

That’s where all the excess money is.

stargazersmith ,
@stargazersmith@social.linux.pizza avatar

@rbreich
Some Trump fed billionaires have invested heavily into the politician market.

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

TRUMP: I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody…

SUPREME COURT: Sure. Seems reasonable.

YouGiveMeFever ,
@YouGiveMeFever@union.place avatar

@rbreich Perhaps the most radical Supreme Court in our nation's history. It's time to dissolve their den of corruption. Term limits and an impeachment process decided by a national referendum.

LynnU ,
@LynnU@universeodon.com avatar

@rbreich Any doubts about the fate of Epstein now?

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar

Would watch!

AddisonAlbright ,
@AddisonAlbright@mastodon.otherworldsink.com avatar

@georgetakei
I’d watch that, but I’d rather watch an event where people try to roast the ice cream man as hilariously as this little British girl: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPREqNbJe/ 😂

ethanjstark ,
@ethanjstark@hachyderm.io avatar

@georgetakei

Still calling to have a smattering of non-athletes participating in each event, as a point of reference.

Same for The Great British Baking Show, only with inexperienced bakers.

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

What a week of fireworks!

From SCOTUS blowing up the rule of law…

to the Biden/Stephanopoulos interview…

to Trump playing dumb about his own Project 2025…

Heather Lofthouse of @imcivicaction & I get into it all in the Coffee Klatch. Watch this:

Gurre ,
@Gurre@mastodon.nu avatar

@rbreich
Imagine the media jumping on Trump after the verdict like they have on Biden after the debate. Crazy thought!

https://mastodon.social/@DebErupts/112739908918904448

lsitongia ,
@lsitongia@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich
Drumpf did say that be wishes Project 2025 luck (not that need it).

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar

You're hired!

TheDarcBird ,
@TheDarcBird@vivaldi.net avatar

@georgetakei

That’s good enough for my team

cqd_sos ,
@cqd_sos@mastodon.online avatar

@georgetakei
The positive attitude is what counts.

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

The greening of planes, trains, and automobiles

We need new fuels as society moves away from coal, natural gas and oil.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/the-greening-of-planes-trains-and-automobiles/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

nutmeg ,

@arstechnica

Spoiler: We do not need one drop of "fuels" for cars, trucks and trains that are highly inefficient and / or lead to even more desastrous exploitation of and pollution to the environment.

smxi ,
@smxi@fosstodon.org avatar

@arstechnica saying we need x or y while suggesting the set of solutions includes cars suggests what we really need is not going to happen. Unfortunately that seems to be what is happening, we keep raising the bar, not realizing we need to start lowering it to get anywhere. It comes down to energy used per passenger mile. This is all well understood. A 2 to 5 ton rolling brick of batteries does slightly drop CO2 per mile but can't scale like mas transit.

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar
nemeciii ,
@nemeciii@mastodon.social avatar

@georgetakei grounding was the least thing to do.

What I would have done would be that he'd have to come clean about the prank to the girl and apologize. Then as an apology offer money for a fine dining dinner at a central location on his expense from his monthly allowance. He wouldn't be at the dinner.

What a dimwit son, I would have made him do all the chores in addition. 😡

tony ,
@tony@hoyle.me.uk avatar

@georgetakei Boys will be boys? Retch. In the 21st century that phrase should have been banished for good.

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar
steinarb ,
@steinarb@mastodon.social avatar

@georgetakei Ooooooo!

CerebralHawks ,
@CerebralHawks@geekdom.social avatar

@georgetakei Bad situation all around. I would contact the host privately and respectfully decline, giving my reason without judgment and asking if they’d be interested in a more personal get together later, if it seemed necessary.

I have allergies, so I can see both sides. Vegans have strong aversions to eating meat (by anyone) that aren’t as deadly serious as allergies, but should be respected in their own home.

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Egalitarian oddity found in the Neolithic

Men, women, and immigrants all seemed to have similar dietary inputs.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/07/egalitarian-oddity-found-in-the-neolithic/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

scavello ,
@scavello@m.epon.io avatar

@arstechnica ah yes the three genders

jpaskaruk ,
@jpaskaruk@growers.social avatar

@arstechnica

Even if they all ate the same beast, some ate the tenderloin, some the T-bone, and some the chuck and the other tough cuts.

I don't think the remains tell us that much detail on the diet.

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar
SteveJB ,

@georgetakei George, I'm not even going to read the article. I agree with you completely.

huntingdon ,
@huntingdon@mstdn.social avatar

@georgetakei

Absent a major illness or long-term job loss, three months is not a stay; it's moving in. If it's her boyfriend, she needs another one. Might be what he was trying to tell her with this stunt. This guy has issues she doesn't need to live with for life.

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar
vashbear ,
@vashbear@hachyderm.io avatar

@georgetakei Hi George, What is the business model of Percolately?

huntingdon ,
@huntingdon@mstdn.social avatar

@georgetakei

Note to Dad: Not everyone has to share the same bed. It's a get together, not a menage a quatre.

georgetakei , to Random
@georgetakei@universeodon.com avatar
virtuous_sloth ,
@virtuous_sloth@cosocial.ca avatar

@georgetakei I do not see much discussion of the approach of having a conversation with the other person where you explain how their behavior (lack of initiation of social situations) make her feel and giving the other person a chance to talk.

Might be a little more productive than a more passive approach, giving the latter might verge on passive-aggresive depending on context.

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

The Supreme Court has greenlit Trump's plan to be a "dictator on Day One." Here's what that could look like.

TAI ,
@TAI@mstdn.social avatar

@rbreich what gave us this SCOTUS? democracy, What gave us trump: democracy. And still nobody sees anything wrong here

shanen ,
@shanen@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

The is merely correcting our misunderstanding of the Constitution. You thought "execute the Office" was about faithfully following the laws? Silly you. Execute means kill and now the can kill his office and any laws (or political opponents) he doesn't like. No idea why it took the six of them over 100 pages to explain such a silly little mistake.

jaykuo , to Random
@jaykuo@universeodon.com avatar

This week’s Just for Xeets and Giggles is out, and MAGA billboards remain unintentionally funny. For the whole collection, see the link in the replies!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines