You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

Bruncvik ,
@Bruncvik@lemmy.world avatar

Forcing companies to pay for commute time would also force companies to lobby for more efficient public transport and cycleways, and limit private car access to areas with regular traffic jams. In addition, there are certain job categories where driving time is limited by law: truck drivers, bus drivers, and others. However, these rules only apply when the driver is being compensated for being on the road. So, your bus driver may have driven for two hours to get to work, and now he’s towards the end of his nine-hour shift, bone-tired. If the company was forced to pay him for his commute, his shift would end after seven hours, and possibly five (if he has to drive back home for another two hours). That would improve road safety. I think the two aspects - more public transport and more road safety - should be enough for everyone to support the idea of paid commute.

Fleur__ ,
@Fleur__@lemmy.world avatar

Would also encourage employers to allow remote working

Bruncvik ,
@Bruncvik@lemmy.world avatar

Absolutely! I’m salaried, so paying for my commute wouldn’t make any difference, but I’m incentivizing my employer to let me work from home by spending my potential commute time at the computer. No big difference for me, but enough that they are happy to let me stay on hybrid.

AngryCommieKender ,

Even salaried workers get overtime in certain situations. You’d either get a raise or a “travel stipend”

Bruncvik ,
@Bruncvik@lemmy.world avatar

Neither. Instead of overtime, we’re partly on flex time, where we can leave on Friday after lunch, if we reached our 40 hours. However, we always have more projects than people, so the hour or so extra per day when working from home is quite normal. No travel stipend, either - I’m lucky to live in a city where one-way journey is €2, which is negligible. It’s certainly cheaper than replenishing my burned calories when I cycle or run to work…

SendMePhotos ,

Holy shit that made a lot of sense.

CaptainHowdy ,
@CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee avatar

In my area, public transport will likely never improve, even with tons of support from local voters and business people because racism.

Bruncvik ,
@Bruncvik@lemmy.world avatar

I lived in Atlanta, and was told that this was the reason one of the counties (Cobb) refused metro transport. Had to reject a job offer there before I got a car.

elshanerino ,

ah, the infamous East Cobb snobs and their NIMBY brigade.

p.s. hello neighbor!

CaptainHowdy ,
@CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee avatar

Small world! That’s literally the exact area I’m talking about!

namingthingsiseasy ,

It would also give employers a shared incentive to address the cost of housing. It would either incentivize the companies to not build all the jobs in a single location (ie. downtown of a major city), or it would give them an incentive to pursue policies that would lower the costs of housing in major metropolitan areas.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • [email protected]
  • random
  • All magazines
    •