You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.
Return
DerisionConsulting , 1 month ago 020518 February 5th, 2018. No Randal, that's not an acceptable way to express a date.
020518
February 5th, 2018.
No Randal, that's not an acceptable way to express a date.
ObstreperousCanadian , 1 month ago ISO 8601 only, please.
ISO 8601 only, please.
jbk , 1 month ago (edited 1 month ago) Sure, how about 2018-W06-1? Or 2018-036? ISO 8601 contains way too many obscure formats. RFC 3339 is pretty much a subset and defines only sensible ones. It also allows 2018-02-05 08:02:43-00:00 (no T and explicitly specifying no timezone)
Sure, how about 2018-W06-1? Or 2018-036?
ISO 8601 contains way too many obscure formats. RFC 3339 is pretty much a subset and defines only sensible ones. It also allows 2018-02-05 08:02:43-00:00 (no T and explicitly specifying no timezone)
2018-02-05 08:02:43-00:00
jmcs , 1 month ago When you plan your work on weekly sprints, week numbers become second nature.
When you plan your work on weekly sprints, week numbers become second nature.
jbk , 1 month ago Yeah but that defeats the purpose of an universal format.
Yeah but that defeats the purpose of an universal format.
JayDee , 1 month ago Yes, correct answer 2002-05-18 2002, May 18th
Yes, correct answer
2002-05-18
2002, May 18th
marcos , 1 month ago He knows.
He knows.
MrScottyTay , 1 month ago 2nd of May 2018
2nd of May 2018
ludrol , 1 month ago 020518 May 18th 2002
May 18th 2002