rolle , to Random
@rolle@mementomori.social avatar

Hello Bluesky, this is me posting from Mastodon. 👋 Bridgy.fed is finally live.

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

I'm not saying we shouldn't worry about how China might be using TikTok to steal our data and manipulate us...

But why aren't we at least as worried about the U.S. billionaires who own the other apps stealing our data and trying to manipulate us?

leswarden ,
@leswarden@mastodon.world avatar

@rbreich What they’re basically saying is you can steal and manipulate data from US citizens if the company is US owned.
This bill doesn’t even remotely get to the root of the mega-social-media problem.
#x

aral , to Random
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

snarfed.org and brid.gy for bridging fediverse folks to Bluesky against their will (and in likely contravention of GDPR in the EU) with typical Silicon Valley techbro sense of entitlement:

“[O]pt in results in far fewer users, and users are critical for a bridge to be useful.”¹

Relevant GitHub issue: https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/835

¹ https://snarfed.org/2023-11-27_re-introducing-bridgy-fed

HT @homegrown

DavidBHimself , to Random

I'm really tired of the holier-than-you people on the Fediverse!

No, Threads is not full of trolls and evil people just because Meta is evil. Threads is full of people who are not terminally online like we are. This is idiotic to want to block Threads by default. If anything let's show them there is another way.

No, the big Mastodon instances are not full of trolls and evil people just because they're the big instances. They're full of people who are into the Fediverse but for reasons that are theirs have no time, energy, or interest to join smaller instances. This is idiotic to want to block such instances. If anything let's teach them about smaller instances.

And right now, I see people building bridges with BlueSKy and I see very negative reactions from some people about that. Well... No, BlueSky is not full of trolls and evil people.

I'm so fucking annoyed with this bullshit attitude.

Honestly, if your response is "don't federate" every single fucking time, have you thought for a second that maybe, just maybe, you are in the wrong place? Fedi fucking verse. It's in the name.

If you don't want to communicate with people who are different from you, you're honestly no different from the people you are calling names. Please go to your instance that's defederated from everyone else, or even better, go on a closed Discord or something.

Fuck, I barely finished my second coffee and I'm already annoyed.

noellemitchell , to Random
@noellemitchell@mstdn.social avatar

So the results from yesterday's poll made it clear: people on the do not want to try ! 😆

82% of people said they will not be using Bluesky now that it's open to the public for registration. I have to say I approve of this high percentage. 😄

https://mstdn.social/@noellemitchell/111887232944577112

readbeanicecream , to Fediverse
@readbeanicecream@kbin.social avatar

Is decentralization the future of social media? Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter created an opportunity for a new kind of social platform.
https://www.engadget.com/is-decentralization-the-future-of-social-media-194554192.html

mikeel , to Fediverse in Is an "everything" app the likely end state within the Fediverse?

Excuse my ignorance here. To what extent can this problem be simplified with DIDs or Decentralized IDs, rather than "federated accounts".

Take the example of Filpboard. I signed up to integrate with . Supposedly, they have AI to process two disparate systems. The result: Nada. Why? Because I have to put some verification HTML in a website.

I have a "domain name handle" that should allow two independent information sources to communicate. The same account, or DID, needs to work on both systems. I don't see that.

https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines