FfaerieOxide

FfaerieOxide , 2 months ago to KDE in My 3yo loves GCompris

You do you as we live in a free world.

You don't know where I live.

The only thing I would be concerned about it if it was illegal to cover your camera

You not concerned about the possibility of someone spying on you? Regardless, treating cameras as eyes is damn good practice.

FfaerieOxide , 2 months ago to KDE in My 3yo loves GCompris

That's not the point. The point is "linux" is not reason to inherently trust a system.

Cover your cameras (as a compromise to ripping them out with a soldering iron).

FfaerieOxide , 2 months ago to KDE in My 3yo loves GCompris

Why would you give them that extra inch though? Cover your cameras.

FfaerieOxide , 2 months ago to KDE in My 3yo loves GCompris

Front-facing cameras should not exist. Yes, on everything.

Did xz not just happen?

Physically block the light.

FfaerieOxide , 2 months ago to KDE in My 3yo loves GCompris

Teach your child to cover front-facing cameras with tape.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

I call shenanigans!

Perhaps, but they are cheeky and fun-loving.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

I refuse to respect corporations like I respect human beings, and I don’t think they deserve human rights or the influence they have over our government.

I don't think corporations are people either. You and I agree on that.

I do think I was correct in my read of the OP screenshot as indicating a desire to own and profit of the labor of a "person"—a position which should be examined and the underpinnings of which roundly rejected.

At a base level it's the same underpinning that inform people's desire to be landlords.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

Why is the entire burden of proof on me? Shouldn’t you have to prove I’ve never called a real person an “NPC?”

No, I shouldn't. I never claimed it was a particularly fair bet. Probably should check the terms before accepting.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

No, just when I find it humorous.

You find dehumanizing others humorous? You should work on being less terrible.

And I’d take that bet ;)

Prove you never have and I'd pay you, otherwise I will forward you a list of charities you can send your loss to. sarcastic smiley

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

Called it. You’re a bot.

Do you always dehumanize those who disagree with you?

€6 says you've used the term "NPC" pejoratively.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

Human rights don’t extend to machines.

Humans are machines. If ones made of metal become sentient why wouldn't they have rights?

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

A “person” isn’t always a human. I care about humans, not whatever our current legal system calls a “person.”

Things are declared "persons" to confer them rights. Person in the OP wants a thing to be conferred rights but still own the profit gleaned from its labor (to the exclusion I should add of the rest of humanity).

Fuck the person in the screen cap.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

Again, we’re talking about using technology to make human lives better.

No, we are talking about a private individual owning persons and profiting off their labor.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

I think they meant a “legal person,”

And I think the kind of asshole who makes a pronoun joke is pining to benefit from enslavement.

Regardless, they clearly desire to reap where others sowed which is dickish.

FfaerieOxide , 3 months ago to LinkedinLunatics in Everything about this comment is cursed

No, I think it’s weird you’re equating slavery with using software and machinery

Guy in the OP is the one who said they wished AI would be declared "person"s so they could adopt own them and profit off their labor while sipping drinks.