If you were a fan of KDE 3 and got hit with KDE 4, you would remember how awful that was. Simply removing features due to a lack of resources is stupid. Donāt release until it is equal to or better than your previous release. So what if it takes 10 years. Releasing half baked crap is how you get KDE 4 and Wayland type crap.
Watch this end up like the KDE 4 fiasco. āWe removed everything you loved, aināt it great!ā Please donāt let me down again, KDE.
How was that rude, I didnāt insult anyone. I even said please when asking not to let me down again. If you want to deny KDE 4 was bad, go ahead, but that is an honest criticism (and one shared by many, as Iām sure you are aware), but to call honest feedback rude is disingenuous. I donāt appreciate you changing the context to try to vilify me. Lastly, the CoC is never mentioned on the KDE Community Wiki until ā22:08, 12 December 2019ā Vinzv talk contribsā 6,507 bytes +3,285ā Migrated content from manifesto.kde.org over hereā, which is long after KDE 4, which is already listed on that same page as āHistorical Informationā as far back as 2011. So from what I can tell, KDE 4 was probably never covered under the CoC, donāt think it existed yet. So it wouldnāt be protected from honest feedback, if that is what the CoC is being used here to prevent.
What was the purpose of this message? Was it to prevent conversations about concerns and worries in this thread? Because it seems unnecessarily defensive. Is there something we should be worried about?