Yes and no. That story was bad for a reasons specific to that story that were uncovered and sourced from other credible reporting. You can’t proceed from that to a blanket generalization over everything else in New York times reports without any additional supporting evidence.
Also it’s sourcing and quoting other sources, so you’d have to explain if you believe that the New York times made up those sources.
Go ahead and make your own thread about those if you like. I don’t understand why you would bring them in to try and change the subject in this particular post unless you’re purposely whatabouting.
Please even just read so much as one paragraph of the article and post anything related to that, anything at all. I don’t feel like that’s asking too much.
So in your opinion is DC Weekly (mentioned in the article) in fact a legitimate american news source? I want to understand more about what specifically they are projecting.
You started out by saying was no evidence, except there was. Now you’ve moved the goalposts and are debating the nuances of the evidence instead of saying that none was presented.
You derailed with whataboutism, you made a blanket generalization based on an unrelated story. Are you just going down the playbook, one derailment tactic at a time?
Five posts from now you will be saying “well yeah, maybe they proved the IP was from Russia, but the guy from Russia generated a fake site with 17 fake authors because he cared so much about journalistic integrity!”
Okay, the next step in the playbook is “no one cares”. I don’t know, I think online disinformation has emerged as one of the major international issues characteristic of our time and will go down in the history books. So I’m not sure where you’re getting the idea that no one cares.
I’m sorry that calling you out on your 💩 means I’m a debate bro. But the flip side of the same coin is that you’re the one spewing the 💩💩💩.
You’ve been wrong literally every step of the way about everything you’ve said and you still want to do this?
The data referenced in the report was recorded from 2021. Your link requires a login so I can’t see what it says, but if I was as much of a wreckless 💩 poster as you, I would just say securitytrails is fake and just making everything up and say “nobody cares”.
[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the moderator]
Propublica: Infamous Russian Troll Farm Appears to Be Source of Anti-Ukraine Propaganda ( www.propublica.org )
The whole thing is interesting, but some key copy + pastes from the article are below:...
Information Attacks on Democracies ( www.bradford-delong.com )
Intro to the article from Brad DeLong:...