@rob299@veganism.social cover

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

rob299 , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
@rob299@veganism.social avatar

@FinchHaven @ThatOneKirbyMain2568 what I meant by that section you quoted from the post was, if Meta were to influence the development of Mastodon. If you switch to Firefish or others mentioned, you would probably have a more preferred dev team then what could happen to Mastodon with Meta.

rob299 , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
@rob299@veganism.social avatar

I wouldn't say kbin would be harmed necessarily even if maybe just a tiny bit. A good amount of the users on Lemmy (can't say much about kbin hadn't tried it yet) hate threads. So as an alternative to Mastodon, that would actually more likely score them points not detract from a user perspective.

Most likely, for a user to be on kbin or Lemmy you either come from Reddit, or you come from Mastodon so the users would had likely made up their mind on separating themselfs from major platforms, that likely includes threads.

rob299 , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
@rob299@veganism.social avatar

@sour depends on how you see it.

My question is, what has Threads done to influence Mastodon development so far in a bad way.

lets Say threads is just the mainstream platform of the fediverse. The protocol is all open source, and every one is in control of their servers. If it is federated whats the worse that could happen?

Plus you can always switch to lemmy, firefish, and etc. to try to avoid threads platform wide.

rob299 , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
@rob299@veganism.social avatar

@ThatOneKirbyMain2568 I made a post that actually covers some of the popular user conserns regarding Threads federating

here https://veganism.social/@rob299/111580401081770723

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines