So if 401ks are bad because they incentivize gambling, what's the alternative? You have a uselessly broad definition that seems to lead people only to a guarantee of losing purchasing power through inflation. Better guarantee a loss than "gamble" with strong evidence to support your risk I see.
Saying "the house always wins" about things like index investing is hilarious.
It's not an assumption, I understand the risks. I know it will go both up and down. That doesn't make it gambling. What on earth isn't gambling in your eyes?
Wait, Lower Decks? LD captures the spirit of Trek better than any official property in a long time. No soap-opera-style parade of cataclysms, just exploring humanity by exploring space.
I was put off by it being a comedy initially, but the framework the comedy happens within does a lot of great examination of Trek and of life. Plus lots of great characters with growth.