Imgur links suck ( kbin.social )

Most Fediverse software supports image uploads, so there's no reason to use Imgur for image hosting. Hell, even on my small single-user server (atomicpoet.org), image hosting is easy peasy. Not only is Imgur not needed, they're an annoyance for those of us who are used to seeing images natively on the Fediverse.

I know habits are hard to break, but just remember: this isn't Reddit 🙂

rpardee ,
@rpardee@hachyderm.io avatar

@atomicpoet Are there implications for who gets to pay for the disk space it takes to store image files?

atomicpoet OP ,
@atomicpoet@kbin.social avatar

As someone who manages multiple Fediverse servers, I wanted to share a friendly perspective on image uploads. If the option to upload images is available on a server, it's likely because the administrator wants you to utilize that feature. Otherwise, they would simply disable it to avoid incurring additional costs for hosting image files. So go ahead and feel free to make use of image uploads when they're available!

kobra ,

lemm.ee has uploads limited to like 100kb so people can use avatars but effectively the admin wants 0 image hosting. Idk what to use outside of imgur, was hoping this thread would have alternates but I don’t see anything outside of pixelfed, which doesn’t support anonymous easy upload.

LollerCorleone ,
@LollerCorleone@kbin.social avatar

I use https://postimages.org/

It is very reliable and supports uploading images upto 24 mb in size and 10k x 10k pixels.

fiofiofio ,

Thanks for the tip, that looks like a good alternative

LollerCorleone ,
@LollerCorleone@kbin.social avatar

No problem! You can also check out https://imgbb.com/, https://imgbox.com/ and https://www.imagebam.com/

kobra ,

I’ll give this a shot in the future, ty!

Hogger85b ,

Remember to stripout any exif data if posting photos

GnothiSeauton ,
@GnothiSeauton@lemmy.world avatar

I could see bandwidth being a big issue if the community grows as well, considering images aren’t cached on your local instance so that could easily take down a smaller server or cause a huge unexpected spike in costs.

I feel like we need a good third option, but I’m not even sure what that would look like. Maybe something distributed like IPFS.

JoeCoT ,
@JoeCoT@kbin.social avatar

On Mastodon, like kbin and lemmy, locally posted images are hosted locally, and remotely hosted images are cached locally. This can cause a lot of storage. But you can run an automated cron that will clear out cached images older than whatever you want, like a month. Then the local cached storage is at a minimum, and if someone wants to view the image again, it'll get fetched. I don't know if kbin and lemmy have this feature, but they should. It's probably not the locally uploaded images that'll take up a ton of space, it's caching all the remote ones that will.

OctoFloofy ,
@OctoFloofy@kbin.social avatar

Note that not all instances do this. Especially not necessarily if they aren't mastodon. My calckey instance for example has it optional and i have it off there. Akkoma i know also can do it optionally.

InEnduringGrowStrong ,

Plenty of larger instances limit the upload size because it can snowball into huge hosting costs rather quickly.

atomicpoet OP ,
@atomicpoet@kbin.social avatar

I've had the chance to join several big servers and even manage my own (calckey.social). Usually, they set an upload size limit of around 10-15MB, which is more than sufficient for most photos.

However, I must say that I'm not a big fan of Imgur. It's not the best experience for visitors and feels like a prime example of something being unnecessarily unpleasant. I believe people mainly use Imgur out of habit, and the drawbacks haven't been significant enough to overcome that familiarity just yet.

noodlejetski ,

yup, I’ve seen Beehaw admins asking people to use external image hosting sites in order to reduce the server load before.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines
    •