You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

Izzy ,
@Izzy@lemmy.world avatar

But can you even try BlueSky? I looked at the website, but it appears to be invite only. Which is a strange choice as it seems like it will prevent it from ever succeeding.

RobBanks ,
@RobBanks@sh.itjust.works avatar

I heard Jack wants all of the power users to be in place first before he let’s the rabble in, but I dunno

Izzy ,
@Izzy@lemmy.world avatar

Seems like a risky move. The whole transition away from old Twitter could be over before bluesky even joins the race. It’s definitely lost my vote in favor of Mastodon. I can register for Mastodon right now.

palordrolap ,

But the model of a protracted invite-only period worked so well for Google Plus, tho.

Blaze ,

I think they are still trying to damage control the PR scandal about the racial slur: techcrunch.com/…/bluesky-racial-slurs-banned-list…

hetscop ,

They've been invite only since before that, it's unrelated

Blaze ,

Then it’s indeed strange that they keep the invite system while it’s a perfect timing for them to grab the Twitter userbase

Alto ,
@Alto@kbin.social avatar

I'd wager they're simply not ready for the sudden influx

CaptainJanegay ,

Since they say that all their content moderation is currently being done by two backend devs on top of their actual jobs, that seems like a safe bet.

brunox ,
@brunox@feddit.cl avatar

Lots of Twitter users I know that “want to leave” twitter are waiting for bluesky. It’s like there’s no other alternative for them, only bsky. I don’t know how long these expectative thing will work out for bsky. Especially now that threads is around.

cyborganism ,

I don’t know why people would join yet another corporate backed social network that exploits them and use their personal information and their content for profit.

hetscop ,

It's gonna go public eventually, this is like a closed beta kind of thing. The purpose seems to be more to get people curious about it and foster a certain culture which I must say that they've been pretty effective at. They strategically handed out invites to a lot of black twitter users for example, which is smart since black twitter has historically been an important cultural force on the internet

Terevos ,
@Terevos@lemm.ee avatar

Facebook was invite only. The you had to have an edu email address. Then they finally opened it up for everyone.

Exclusivity can drive marketing for a time. People want in on what only some can have.

blivet ,
@blivet@kbin.social avatar

Up to a point. Google+ was invite only for so long that by the time it became available to the general public no one cared anymore. When people signed in with their new accounts they couldn’t find anyone they knew, and they never came back.

Really stupid on Google’s part, because they launched at a time when people were angry with Facebook for selling private user data, and a lot of users probably would have moved to G+ if they had been able to.

Terevos ,
@Terevos@lemm.ee avatar

There’s a number of things they messed up with Google+. I did like their share circles concept.

a-man-from-earth ,
@a-man-from-earth@kbin.social avatar

I remember Google Mail being invite only...

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines
    •