You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

akhenaten0 ,

It’s healthier than Babylon 5, which is a much smaller property, under the thumb of more incompetent leadership at Warner/AT&T/HBO/Max, and is still coming out with a Blu-Ray remaster later this year.

Trek is fine. There may be some doldrums, but it’s healthier now than in the post-Nemesis (2002) post-Enterprise (2005) landscape. And even then, it was only four years before Star Trek (2009).

Again, there’s a smaller gap between Enterprise and JJ Abrams than there is between Discovery s.1 (2017) and today. Stay calm.

michaelgemar ,
@michaelgemar@mstdn.ca avatar

@akhenaten0 @startrek I’m old enough to be a TOS fan prior to the movies, much less TNG, so a time when there are multiple Trek shows on at the same time is mind-blowing. I really don’t think it likely that there’d be no Trek anywhere, at least for long.

Riker_Maneuver ,
@Riker_Maneuver@startrek.website avatar

It’s healthier than Babylon 5, which is a much smaller property, under the thumb of more incompetent leadership at Warner/AT&T/HBO/Max

Man, you weren’t kidding. That’s some special leadership to let one dude keep it down all this time.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines