You are only browsing one thread in the discussion! All comments are available on the post page.

Return

USSBurritoTruck Mod ,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Neat!

I am a bit disappointed that these are going to be explicitly non-canon, though.

ValueSubtracted OP Mod ,
@ValueSubtracted@startrek.website avatar

I refuse to accept that, and will only ever refer to the very Short Treks when debating the finer points of Star Trek.

Corgana ,
@Corgana@startrek.website avatar

I’m tempted to go back to Reddit just to make a nitpicky Redditor’s head explode with this:

https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/8d8e97d7-936f-431f-a73c-9aeb7ea0e150.jpeg

USSBurritoTruck Mod ,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

I’m sure everyone there would be super cool and normal with ensign Balzac and lieutenant Philips.

JWBananas ,
@JWBananas@startrek.website avatar

What… Is… This…

Corgana ,
@Corgana@startrek.website avatar

Canon

JWBananas ,
@JWBananas@startrek.website avatar

Funny, but not helpful.

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

Sadly not, they’re confirmed to not be canon. You’ll have to settle for (butt)headcanon.

JWBananas ,
@JWBananas@startrek.website avatar

What is it from?

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

They’re in the Very Short Treks teaser that the article is referring to.

whileloop ,
@whileloop@lemmy.world avatar

I expect that the Very Short Treks won’t be entirely non-canon. For instance, some episode might introduce an event, place, or technology that is actually canon even if the events of the episode itself are not canon.

Alternatively, they could be loosely canon in the same way as the Lego Star Wars shows/games, with the rough events and plots being canon even if exact details are not.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines
    •