Linux_Is_Best , to Random
@Linux_Is_Best@mstdn.social avatar

Att Fediverse

The flagship instance of Fire Fish is now OFFLINE.

The significance of this event is many of the Fire Fish Developers have previously come forward claiming the lead developer vanished. Unfortunately, the lead developer treated their project as a centralized project, meaning that they were the sole person making decisions, giving no access to accounts or code changes or even donations, despite having a team behind them.

1 of 2

Linux_Is_Best OP ,
@Linux_Is_Best@mstdn.social avatar

2 of 2

Fire Fish is now a dead project with the lead developer missing for more than half a year, the remaining developers disbanding, and today, the flagship instance Fire Fish dot Social going OFFLINE.

It is strongly recommended that you migrate your instance to another platform.

You have options

  • Sharkey
  • Misskey
  • Mastodon

Please consider Fire Fish no longer receives updates, including security.

vrtxd , to Random
@vrtxd@mastodon.social avatar
ALT
  • Reply
  • Loading...
  • testing OP , to Fediverse in firefish project in trouble
    @testing@kbin.social avatar

    @Chozo
    this is the english machine translation of naskya's post:

    Even if you ask me when the next version will be out, I don't know.

    one week ago, naskya stated in another post:

    Firefish v1.0.5 を出すために必要にゃ雑用は 2 日くらい前に睡眠時間を捧げてほとんど片付けたのであとは Kainoa さん次第です

    english machine translation:

    I devoted my sleep time to do most of the chores needed to release Firefish v1.0.5 about 2 days ago, so the rest is up to Kainoa.

    source: https://post.naskya.net/notes/9n8d2h0qq12bdzm1

    A case for preemptively defederating with Threads ( kbin.social )

    With Meta beginning to test federation, there's a lot of discussion as to whether we should preemptively defederate with Threads. I made a post about the question, and it seems that opinions differ a lot among people on Kbin. There were a lot of arguments for and against regarding ads, privacy, and content quality, but I don't...

    ThatOneKirbyMain2568 OP , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
    @ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social avatar

    I feel the post doesn't really address my concerns.

    Really? You think Threads will take over and rule Mastodon? Threads is its own platform, users on the fediverse can still join Mastodon of their choice and leave. I expect we'l see plenty of anti Mastodon servers pop up. If Threads were to somehow get an influence in Mastodon, just switch to switch to switch to So many choices.

    This seems to not really understand the risk Threads poses. Threads is its own platform, yes, but it will dominate the visible content of any instance that federates with it. It's very dangerous to depend on a massive, profit-driven corporation for activity on the fediverse, as the things we value on the fediverse (decentralization, transparency, even distribution of content between instances, etc.) go against the corporation's motives. Meta does not stand to benefit from any of the things we value, and most of the Threads userbase (i.e. casual Instagram users) probably won't notice or care about federation. Meta does benefit if everyone depends on them for content, as then they can pull people to Threads just by defederating. People will choose to go to Threads where the amount of activity is what they're used to over staying on their Mastodon instance after activity has plummeted and they can't see most of the people they follow.

    This is a big one. Meta might capture the mainstrean fediverse. Lets just be real the average regular internet user wasn't going to join Mastodon in the first place. Not that they wouldn't want to it just isn't on their list next to or even . Actually I take what Meta is doing as a compliment to the fediverse. Remember Twitter at one time under banned the talk of Mastodon or something like that. Threads might not have our interests at heart but they are already mainstream so why should they not allow their users be federated with us?

    Yes, there are definitely a lot of people that the fediverse is just never going to appeal to. But of those who are interested in the fediverse, more will be inclined to join Threads due to it having most of the content & just requiring an Instagram login. There is a pool of people out there who will try out the fediverse if they're introduced to it — that's how we all got here — and if people can interact with the big Mastodon, Kbin, etc. instances from Threads, many will choose to do that when they wouldn't have otherwise.

    FinchHaven , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
    @FinchHaven@sfba.social avatar

    @ThatOneKirbyMain2568

    "If were to somehow get an influence in , just switch to switch to switch to So many choices"

    This exposes how little (if anything) the writer understands about any of those distributions

    Mastodon is not interchangeable with Lemmy

    Mastodon is not interchangeable with Pixelfed

    Mastodon is not interchangeable with Firefish

    Period

    cc @rob299

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines