rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

I'm not saying we shouldn't worry about how China might be using TikTok to steal our data and manipulate us...

But why aren't we at least as worried about the U.S. billionaires who own the other apps stealing our data and trying to manipulate us?

polykultura ,
@polykultura@social.cologne avatar

@rbreich yes, suddenly, all the flaws of social media are being mentioned. 😂😂

benroyce ,
@benroyce@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

"worried about the U.S. billionaires who own the other apps"

🤦

is co-owned by Jeff Yass

the biggest donor

robert: he's the vice chair of the f***ing Cato Institute

tiktok users are funding the GOP and conservative desolation of the

i've typed this comment 5-10 times in

why do people not know this?

why the f*** do people have this ignorant belief tiktok is magically different from ? it's the same plutocrat sh**

https://www.influencewatch.org/person/jeffrey-yass/

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Biden signs bill to ban TikTok if Chinese owner ByteDance doesn’t sell

Bill gives ByteDance 270 days to sell TikTok or app loses access to US market.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/biden-signs-bill-to-ban-tiktok-if-chinese-owner-bytedance-doesnt-sell/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

makendo ,
@makendo@fairy.id avatar

@arstechnica 4 years ago, updated their export control laws to effectively block any potential sale of .

The only options are to shut down the American subsidiary (maybe continuing service from Europe), and to go to the federal supreme court claiming that the bill violates the First Amendment. On Zhihu most think the former outcome is very likely.

Maybe we can start to bet on the outcome of the East Asian theater of .

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

China orders Apple to remove Meta apps after “inflammatory” posts about president

WhatsApp, Threads, Telegram, and Signal removed from Apple App Store in China.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/china-orders-apple-to-remove-meta-apps-after-inflammatory-posts-about-president/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

voron ,
@voron@mstdn.party avatar

@arstechnica so about that ban, sounds like China is saying, yup we will lock all your shit out

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Is TikTok’s parent company an agent of the Chinese state?

Op-ed: In China Inc., it’s a little more complicated than that.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/is-tiktoks-parent-company-an-agent-of-the-chinese-state/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

BaltschunJoerg ,
@BaltschunJoerg@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Is rain wet?

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

ByteDance unlikely to sell TikTok, as former Trump official plots purchase

TikTok CEO urges users to protest bill, warns it "will lead to a ban."

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/bytedance-unlikely-to-sell-tiktok-as-former-trump-official-plots-purchase/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

vibudanimsara ,
@vibudanimsara@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica United States must respect human rights and freedom.If someone doesn't like TikTok,they can avoid using it.And anyone who wants to use it should be free to use it.It must be the people's choice.That is human freedom.

The government can impose any sanctions on ByteDance or any other company.But they can't ban tiktok in a way that people can't use it on their personal smart phones.If they do that America is the same as Russia, China and Iran.

vrtxd , to Random
@vrtxd@mastodon.social avatar
ALT
  • Reply
  • Loading...
  • A case for preemptively defederating with Threads ( kbin.social )

    With Meta beginning to test federation, there's a lot of discussion as to whether we should preemptively defederate with Threads. I made a post about the question, and it seems that opinions differ a lot among people on Kbin. There were a lot of arguments for and against regarding ads, privacy, and content quality, but I don't...

    ThatOneKirbyMain2568 OP , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
    @ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social avatar

    I feel the post doesn't really address my concerns.

    Really? You think Threads will take over and rule Mastodon? Threads is its own platform, users on the fediverse can still join Mastodon of their choice and leave. I expect we'l see plenty of anti Mastodon servers pop up. If Threads were to somehow get an influence in Mastodon, just switch to switch to switch to So many choices.

    This seems to not really understand the risk Threads poses. Threads is its own platform, yes, but it will dominate the visible content of any instance that federates with it. It's very dangerous to depend on a massive, profit-driven corporation for activity on the fediverse, as the things we value on the fediverse (decentralization, transparency, even distribution of content between instances, etc.) go against the corporation's motives. Meta does not stand to benefit from any of the things we value, and most of the Threads userbase (i.e. casual Instagram users) probably won't notice or care about federation. Meta does benefit if everyone depends on them for content, as then they can pull people to Threads just by defederating. People will choose to go to Threads where the amount of activity is what they're used to over staying on their Mastodon instance after activity has plummeted and they can't see most of the people they follow.

    This is a big one. Meta might capture the mainstrean fediverse. Lets just be real the average regular internet user wasn't going to join Mastodon in the first place. Not that they wouldn't want to it just isn't on their list next to or even . Actually I take what Meta is doing as a compliment to the fediverse. Remember Twitter at one time under banned the talk of Mastodon or something like that. Threads might not have our interests at heart but they are already mainstream so why should they not allow their users be federated with us?

    Yes, there are definitely a lot of people that the fediverse is just never going to appeal to. But of those who are interested in the fediverse, more will be inclined to join Threads due to it having most of the content & just requiring an Instagram login. There is a pool of people out there who will try out the fediverse if they're introduced to it — that's how we all got here — and if people can interact with the big Mastodon, Kbin, etc. instances from Threads, many will choose to do that when they wouldn't have otherwise.

    readbeanicecream , to Fediverse
    @readbeanicecream@kbin.social avatar

    You already knew that is a great replacement for and can be used with . You also already knew that kbin was a great replacement for . But did you know that kbin can filter by and ; making it a great replace for and ? Learn more at:
    https://unofficial-kbin-guide.surge.sh/filter-bar/

    Chozo , (edited ) to Fediverse

    I feel like the reason , and the at large, aren't taking off has to do with the fact that they're actually social networks. People don't seem to want a social network, they want content platforms. People aren't using or or to keep up with their friends these days, they're using these apps to entertain themselves. And since and every other platform that used to be a social network began pivoting toward content promotion, I think society has forgotten what a social network is supposed to actually be anymore.

    (E: Grammar.)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines