arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Meta to train undefined AI tech on Facebook users’ posts, pics in EU

EU Facebook users have until June 26 to opt out of AI training.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/06/meta-to-train-undefined-ai-tech-on-facebook-users-posts-pics-in-eu/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

Blort Bot ,
@Blort@social.tchncs.de avatar

@arstechnica

If you still have a Facebook account, I would suggest that now is an excellent time to delete all the content and upload a ton of random mutant scribbles to screw with their training data.

You want to screw with my data?
My data will screw with you.

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

I'm not saying we shouldn't worry about how China might be using TikTok to steal our data and manipulate us...

But why aren't we at least as worried about the U.S. billionaires who own the other apps stealing our data and trying to manipulate us?

benroyce ,
@benroyce@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

"worried about the U.S. billionaires who own the other apps"

🤦

is co-owned by Jeff Yass

the biggest donor

robert: he's the vice chair of the f***ing Cato Institute

tiktok users are funding the GOP and conservative desolation of the

i've typed this comment 5-10 times in

why do people not know this?

why the f*** do people have this ignorant belief tiktok is magically different from ? it's the same plutocrat sh**

https://www.influencewatch.org/person/jeffrey-yass/

Smootasaurus , to Random
@Smootasaurus@mstdn.social avatar

Sharing what's going on with actual happening over on . Zuck has beef with a small newsroom calling out ethics and they've decided to try wiping it off the internet. Tell all your friends to bring their receipts to before they're gone too

Link to Kansas Reflector article - https://kansasreflector.com/2024/04/04/facebook-has-blocked-kansas-reflector-heres-what-were-doing-and-how-you-can-help/

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Facebook secretly spied on Snapchat usage to confuse advertisers, court docs say

Zuckerberg told execs to “figure out” how to spy on encrypted Snapchat traffic.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/facebook-secretly-spied-on-snapchat-usage-to-confuse-advertisers-court-docs-say/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

steelefortress ,
@steelefortress@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Indeed, Facebook reportedly launched a secret project in 2016, known as “Project Ghostbusters”, to intercept and decrypt network traffic between Snapchat users and its servers. The goal was to gain insights into user behavior and help Facebook compete with Snapchat. This revelation underscores the importance of privacy and the need for robust data protection measures.

vrtxd , to Random
@vrtxd@mastodon.social avatar
ALT
  • Reply
  • Loading...
  • A case for preemptively defederating with Threads ( kbin.social )

    With Meta beginning to test federation, there's a lot of discussion as to whether we should preemptively defederate with Threads. I made a post about the question, and it seems that opinions differ a lot among people on Kbin. There were a lot of arguments for and against regarding ads, privacy, and content quality, but I don't...

    ThatOneKirbyMain2568 OP , to Fediverse in A case for preemptively defederating with Threads
    @ThatOneKirbyMain2568@kbin.social avatar

    I feel the post doesn't really address my concerns.

    Really? You think Threads will take over and rule Mastodon? Threads is its own platform, users on the fediverse can still join Mastodon of their choice and leave. I expect we'l see plenty of anti Mastodon servers pop up. If Threads were to somehow get an influence in Mastodon, just switch to switch to switch to So many choices.

    This seems to not really understand the risk Threads poses. Threads is its own platform, yes, but it will dominate the visible content of any instance that federates with it. It's very dangerous to depend on a massive, profit-driven corporation for activity on the fediverse, as the things we value on the fediverse (decentralization, transparency, even distribution of content between instances, etc.) go against the corporation's motives. Meta does not stand to benefit from any of the things we value, and most of the Threads userbase (i.e. casual Instagram users) probably won't notice or care about federation. Meta does benefit if everyone depends on them for content, as then they can pull people to Threads just by defederating. People will choose to go to Threads where the amount of activity is what they're used to over staying on their Mastodon instance after activity has plummeted and they can't see most of the people they follow.

    This is a big one. Meta might capture the mainstrean fediverse. Lets just be real the average regular internet user wasn't going to join Mastodon in the first place. Not that they wouldn't want to it just isn't on their list next to or even . Actually I take what Meta is doing as a compliment to the fediverse. Remember Twitter at one time under banned the talk of Mastodon or something like that. Threads might not have our interests at heart but they are already mainstream so why should they not allow their users be federated with us?

    Yes, there are definitely a lot of people that the fediverse is just never going to appeal to. But of those who are interested in the fediverse, more will be inclined to join Threads due to it having most of the content & just requiring an Instagram login. There is a pool of people out there who will try out the fediverse if they're introduced to it — that's how we all got here — and if people can interact with the big Mastodon, Kbin, etc. instances from Threads, many will choose to do that when they wouldn't have otherwise.

    Chozo , (edited ) to Fediverse

    I feel like the reason , and the at large, aren't taking off has to do with the fact that they're actually social networks. People don't seem to want a social network, they want content platforms. People aren't using or or to keep up with their friends these days, they're using these apps to entertain themselves. And since and every other platform that used to be a social network began pivoting toward content promotion, I think society has forgotten what a social network is supposed to actually be anymore.

    (E: Grammar.)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines