I read the OGC report and my interpretation is that it was heavily implied that her race was a factor in why non-university sources were bitching and moaning about her hiring to members of the board of regents, who were uncharacteristically involved in asking the president about this hiring.
Like just because no one on the record says "don't hire a black woman" doesn't mean they aren't all dog whistling to each other about her race.
In the OGC report, at one point the BoR or president expressed concern about "the optics" of hiring someone who's done research in a DEI topic/worked on at least one committee to increase representation in newsrooms during the last state legislative session, under which a law was signed by piss baby Abbott to make it illegal to consider diversity in the hiring process. The OGC report is clear that the president intervened to delay McElroy's hire date until after the end of that legislative session at the very least.
I'm glad A&M settled, but I think she should have sued for more. It's funny that she made more money off this than if she had worked there 5 years in the original offer...
Hi @DMBFFF. Your submission is missing a label in the title. We also ask that the title be the same as on the original source (except for all caps). If you'd like to add context or a submission statement for a video source, you may do so in the body of the submission instead of in the title.
Hi @gonzoleroy. Your submission is missing a label in the title. We also ask that users don't pontificate in the body of the submission. Start the conversation by adding the first comment. Use the body to share a few paragraphs copy and pasted from the story.
We do not permit images as submission links, but we do invite discussion threads. Please repost without the image link and with the label for the title. Otherwise, I appreciate you contributing by starting this conversation!
