Impatient observer.
This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance
rbreich , 2 months ago to Random Obviously there is nothing "pro-life" about the Supreme Court debating whether states can order doctors to let women die rather than provide a life-saving abortion in a medical emergency. I can't believe this even needs to be said.
Obviously there is nothing "pro-life" about the Supreme Court debating whether states can order doctors to let women die rather than provide a life-saving abortion in a medical emergency. I can't believe this even needs to be said.
therieau , 2 months ago @rbreich Unfortunately, this needs to be said until the Supreme Court is expanded to 50 justices.
@rbreich Unfortunately, this needs to be said until the Supreme Court is expanded to 50 justices.
