Obviously there is nothing "pro-life" about the Supreme Court debating whether states can order doctors to let women die rather than provide a life-saving abortion in a medical emergency. I can't believe this even needs to be said.
@rbreich And I can’t believe that #IdahoWomen would be so #STEPFORDED that they would vote for people who would force them and their daughters to have abortions in public toilets. Idaho less of a place and more of a rather dystopia state of mind.
@rbreich Medical problems during pregnancy should never have to reach the emergency phase. It's often clear early on that either a fetus or the mother are not going to have a safe & healthy outcome.
@rbreich
A "miscarriage" is a "spontaneous abortion". Someone experiencing hemorrhage during a miscarriage would not be treated and would be left to bleed to death.
@rbreich And what happened to the Supremacy Clause? My understanding is that when federal and state law conflict, federal law triumphs unless the federal law isn't constitutional. But conservative justices seem to be creating a neo-Confederacy, where conservative states can thumb their noses at the feds but still collect taxpayer money.
@rbreich Judges shouldn't attempt to practice medicine, but if they persist, then in reciprocity doctors should practice law and pass binding legal judgment on judges and lawyers.