motherjones.com

DadWagonDriver , to Politics in Radicals took over the Michigan GOP. Now they can’t stop losing.

Gotta keep momentum going here in Michigan while the GOP is down. We’ve been doing some GREAT things so far, and I hope we can push further left.

Our governor is pretty great, but she is the daughter of the former CEO of Blue Cross of Michigan, so we’ll never get universal healthcare here under her watch.

LibertyLizard , to Politics in Radicals took over the Michigan GOP. Now they can’t stop losing.
@LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net avatar

The frightening part here is that one party rule rarely lasts, and most voters won’t be paying attention to the truly sick and twisted views of these people. So eventually, when the economy tanks or there’s some scandal, voters will want change and the fascists will be waiting in the wings for their moment.

Alto , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws
@Alto@kbin.social avatar

"Think of the kids!" They scream as they actively support legislation that will (and almost certainly has) lead to the suicide of many young Louisianans

SpaceNoodle ,

They want them dead. That’s literally their goal.

Alto ,
@Alto@kbin.social avatar

Trust me, I'm well aware that there will be an outright genocide if they get their way

BrooklynMan ,
@BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml avatar

indirectly, they already are

Ensign_Crab ,

It’s their stated goal.

iamhangry ,

He is… thinking about his kids.

perviouslyiner , (edited )

they market these bills as bills to save children. Now, I actually save children and I know what it means to save a child. I know what it means to support a child and support our own children. None of these bills have anything to do with saving children

AlwaysNowNeverNotMe , to Politics in One politician stopped California’s fossil fuels divestment—again
@AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social avatar

But she didn't sign an affidavit saying this is a bribe so it's "not". Quid pro quo only exists in law books.

ickplant , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws
@ickplant@lemmy.world avatar

Louisiana hurt itself in its confusion.

NatakuNox , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws
@NatakuNox@lemmy.world avatar

They will end up suing blue states for stealing all their health care and education professionals. Before you say that’s far fetched, remember, the republican party is all about blaming others for their failures. They sue California for having too high emissions standards so suing because educated people prefer to live in a better state with better pay is a liberal conspiracy to undermine “freedom.”

Kalkaline ,
@Kalkaline@programming.dev avatar

They should just do like Rand Paul and declare themselves doctors and do their own heart transplant surgeries.

NatakuNox ,
@NatakuNox@lemmy.world avatar

Red states almost unanimously have made it illegal for health care workers and education to strike, so I’m sure they’ll announce a state of emergency making it illegal for those workers to leave the state.

modulartable , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws

Let’s hope ole Doctor Jesus is on call! Think of the kids!

unconsciousvoidling , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws

Everyone knows the only one that can heal your heart is Jesus.

Selmafudd , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws

Fuck around and find out I guess

STUPIDVIPGUY , to Politics in Birthright citizenship is fundamental to “who we are as a nation.” So why do Republicans attack it?

because republicans are the antithesis of what it means to be american

Anomandaris ,
@Anomandaris@kbin.social avatar

What could be a more fundamental part of the American Dream than the "tired, poor, huddled masses" trying to give their children a better future through naturalization.

This is just another Republican nail in the coffin of that dream, killing everything that made others envious of America while they shout more and more shrilly that America is still the best country on the planet.

TheKingBee ,
@TheKingBee@lemmy.world avatar

I disagree I think the Republicans are the modern embodiment of the real American Spirit.

Founded on genocide and chattel slavery, grown with more genocide and wars of expansion. White hegemony enforced through laws and lynchings. Redlining, supreme Court approved internment camps, so many wars on poor countries filled with brown people that have done literally nothing to us.

Any progress you feel is a modern affect and not actually reaching the core of who we are as a people…

STUPIDVIPGUY ,

Then maybe we need to redefine it.

BartsBigBugBag ,

Or maybe we can stop tying our identity to our place of birth.

Norgur , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

brianshatchet , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws

So...Actions have consequences?!

ken27238 , to Politics in One of Louisiana's only pediatric heart transplant doctors is moving because of anti-LGBTQ laws
@ken27238@lemmy.ml avatar

The brain drain continues.

starrox , to Politics in Mike Pence Fled for His Life on January 6. He Still Won't Call Trump’s Actions Criminal.
@starrox@sh.itjust.works avatar
Umbra , to Politics in Birthright citizenship is fundamental to “who we are as a nation.” So why do Republicans attack it?

Lol, what a ridiculous headline. Fundamental??

hoodatninja ,
@hoodatninja@kbin.social avatar

Well, yes. Naturalization has been there from the beginning and "Birthright Citizenship" as we currently know it was solidified during reconstruction. So yeah, it's pretty fundamental to who we are as a nation. It's responsible for who we are as a nation. Quite literally, in fact.

spaceghoti OP ,

FTA:

After the Civil War, Congress overrode the veto of then-President Andrew Johnson to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which declared people “of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude” who are born in the United States to be citizens.

Sounds pretty fundamental to me.

Umbra ,

More Like utterly irrelevant for over 150 years

spaceghoti OP ,

The principle, enshrined into law in 1866, has granted citizenship to countless people for over two hundred years. How do you get “irrelevant” from that?

Umbra ,

That's not what its purpose was.

spaceghoti OP ,

Several hundred years of legal precedent disagree with you. Please tell me, since you know better: what was its “true” purpose?

Umbra ,

Its purpose was to grant former slaves citizenship.

BraveSirZaphod ,
@BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social avatar

So weird they forgot to add in a "born in the United States before 1865" clause if that's what they meant. What a bunch of dummies!

spaceghoti OP ,

It can’t possibly have had more than one purpose? Especially given the broad language used that explicitly covered all people born here?

This is a truly extraordinary insight. Who knows how many judges have been ruling incorrectly, and here you come clarifying it for us all! Truly, you are a gift to us all.

TheKingBee ,
@TheKingBee@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah that broad language didn’t cover native Americans…

I’m not saying it’s irrelevant like they’re arguing but it’s not as fundamental as your arguing either…

America has broadly worded laws like this not because we’re progressive but because our founders were so fundamentally racist that they literally didn’t think about brown people or women as people and so these laws would never apply to them…

www.loc.gov/item/today-in-history/june-02/

spaceghoti OP ,

The fact that it’s been enforced selectively doesn’t invalidate it. It just means there’s room (and reason!) to improve.

TheKingBee ,
@TheKingBee@lemmy.world avatar

Not arguing that just saying that the selective enforcement kind of proves it’s not as fundamental as you’re arguing it is…

spaceghoti OP ,

Freedom of speech is also a fundamental principle of our nation, but it’s also selectively enforced. I don’t think your argument refutes mine as well as you think.

hoodatninja ,
@hoodatninja@kbin.social avatar

Pretty sure the courts decide that and, so far, they've decided it's pretty dang relevant.

TheBat ,
@TheBat@lemmy.world avatar

Just like second amendment?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines