newsweek.com

brain_in_a_box , to Politics in Democrat Calls Out Ethics Issues to Supreme Court Justice's Face

Sounds like these dems need to be reminded of a little thing called “separation of powers”

GiantRobotTRex ,

A key part of the “separation of powers” is the aspect of “checks and balances”.

brain_in_a_box ,

Expecting government officials to face consequences for their actions is authoritarianism.

sanguinepar , to Politics in Democrat Calls Out Ethics Issues to Supreme Court Justice's Face
@sanguinepar@lemmy.world avatar

Amid the controversies, the Supreme Court’s approval rating has dropped to a record low.

Controversy doesn’t help, but isn’t the drop in approval more likely down to the Court’s actions, particularly overturning Roe?

Nougat , to Politics in Democrat Calls Out Ethics Issues to Supreme Court Justice's Face

Dick Durbin of Illinois has always been kind of a legend. I'm not sure why he goes so generally unnoticed.

doom_and_gloom , (edited )

[Thread, post or comment was deleted by the author]

  • Loading...
  • Nougat ,

    Not sure, I’ll have to look.

    TacoButtPlug , to Politics in Democrat Calls Out Ethics Issues to Supreme Court Justice's Face
    @TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works avatar

    40% … I hate this fucking country.

    eighthourlunch , to Politics in Democrat Calls Out Ethics Issues to Supreme Court Justice's Face
    @eighthourlunch@kbin.social avatar

    Talk is cheap.

    j4k3 , to Politics in Democrat Calls Out Ethics Issues to Supreme Court Justice's Face
    @j4k3@lemmy.world avatar

    All talk, no teeth, and no action against these criminals

    NewPerspective , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell

    Calling the Ukraine war unwinnable really brushes the value of having allies under the rug. And have you seen the Russian forces? Laughably inept.

    solidgrue , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell
    @solidgrue@lemmy.world avatar

    But I’ve already called dibbs on control over Biden & McConnell! It was May 2020. I have a receipt.

    btaf45 , (edited ) to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell

    This is not actual real news. It's bullshit from a billionaire bought and controlled far right "news" site designed to get more gigantic tax cuts for billionaire elites. Loser Trump's mindless rambling shows way more signs of dementia than either Moscow Mitch or Dark Brandon.

    c0mbatbag3l , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell
    @c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

    Damn, but hear me out.

    Why don’t we just put a law in place that restricts 65 as the max age for politicians?

    If you’re too old to work you’re too old to understand what working class people need from their policymakers. That’s before we even get into issues like “how’s an 80 year old that can’t even connect to WiFi going to make good digital laws?”

    BraveSirZaphod , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell
    @BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social avatar

    Because nothing says libertarian like using government power to arbitrarily overthrow democratically elected politicians.

    Jaysyn , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell
    @Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar

    Filing this would be fraud.

    AbidanYre , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell

    we’re serious about getting someone in the White House who has the mental capacity to run the country

    Well, that precludes anyone in the libertarian party.

    PugJesus , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell
    @PugJesus@kbin.social avatar

    and has incurred over $4.8 trillion in debt since taking office in 2021. The subject has also involved us in an unwinnable war [in Ukraine].”

    Damn, they had some sympathy for a political stunt at least until this. Fuck these assholes.

    Doug , to Politics in Libertarians want control over Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell

    she is hesitant about imposing age limits

    Y’know, except the minimums that already exist.

    If there’s a lower limit there should be an upper one. If we’re acknowledging that different people can be more or less capable in their 80s then we should do the same for late 20s.

    But we won’t because anyone young enough is a “dumb kid” to far too many Americans, especially the ones ok with the status quo.

    Kerensky1101 ,

    My thoughts on it should be that a politician can serve until the full retirement age as defined by the federal government, which is currently 67. Mental decline in later life is definitely a thing and I don’t feel like people who are in the age range for mental decline should be running the country.

    Facebones ,

    As somebody who generally exists outside of all the cliques and status quos, I can’t comprehend how this isn’t already a thing (especially considering that age has been bumped up a couple times to keep “with the times”)

    Poggervania ,
    @Poggervania@kbin.social avatar

    On paper this sounds good, but in practice I worry if people in power would end up going “lmao let’s increase the retirement age to 100” and then fuck over the citizenry even harder.

    Taleya , (edited )

    Oh they would. They definitely would

    Doug ,

    There are a few things that should be tied to other things imo.

    Congressional salary? Median income for your district might be a good one. Something related to minimum wage could also work.

    Kerensky1101 ,

    My thoughts on the congressional salary is that it should be a multiplier of the minimum wage and congress caht change that multiplier. They want a raise? Then they have to raise the minimum wage for everyone

    Doug ,

    I’m very much with you there. The other option was rooted in the idea of being invested in improvement for their constituants. As long as you crack down on “contributions” you’d probably also see a lot less PAC money in a whole lot of areas too.

    But there should be more motivation for them to see the people succeed. The job itself clearly isn’t enough for a lot of them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines