I’m with you, no one above the law. The only way they’re not pouncing all over Biden if they had anything is trying to muddy the waters in an October surprise after Trump had already been convicted of half a dozen felonies.
Even if what you’re saying is true, which there is currently no evidence for, what exactly is your point? Are you saying Trump should not be prosecuted for his many, many crimes because “Biden also committed crimes”? Honestly asking.
The difference being provable claims and speculation.
For example, I speculate that Biden appointed the french ambassador because she may have bought Hunter Biden's artwork.. But I can only speculate because I have no evidence to match my speculation.
I don't hate Trump, I even gave him the benefit of the doubt when he was first impeached. I sided with republicans and thought that was a bit out of character.
That being said. More evidence came out. One point doesn't draw a conclusion, but a bunch of dots start forming a line.
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
He did it, and I wish he hadn't, but he did. No one that is innocent that is as rich as Donald Trump gets that close to prison without screwing up majorly.