arstechnica ,
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

YouTube will start blocking third-party clients that don’t show ads

Google would really like it if everyone just paid for YouTube Premium instead.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/04/youtube-will-start-blocking-third-party-clients-that-dont-show-ads/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

sven_md ,

@arstechnica with no skip-scenes, why not hovering over the thumbnail/preview when seaching (won't work with those suggested videos)

but some do prevent previewing their's, it can CC-caption &un/-mute too, just: mostly subtitles in only on language

saves seconds anyway in watching or not scrolling through its comments, not yet to fav. &it can rewind by the mouse at the bar, not sure how mobiles be handling that?

jackemled ,
@jackemled@furry.engineer avatar

@arstechnica I wouldn't have an issue with this if Google would pay YouTube video authors, but they don't, so I'm not giving them any money.

helmet91 ,
@helmet91@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Does anyone know of torrent trackers, where YouTube videos are getting uploaded regularly?

Draconic_NEO ,
@Draconic_NEO@pawb.fun avatar

@arstechnica People greatly overestimate Youtube's ability to stop or get people to stop unofficially accessing the content from the platform. As long as you can access on the browser without logging in it will always be possible in some form, and let's face it logged out access is paramount for YouTube to maintain popularity.

awooo ,
@awooo@floofy.tech avatar

@arstechnica This is quite bad, and I mean it

Google actually has the means to close off their mobile APIs, because trusted computing has completely taken over the mobile world, this would just leave the web browser version of YouTube wide open...

And then they could hit us with something like requiring a high security level of widevine to view higher resolutions, embedding ads in the video stream, or heck maybe they'll bring back web integrity and bully others into adopting it so they get a "usable" YouTube experience

Microsoft has actually opened up this possibility for them in a couple years thanks to windows 11 requiring TPMs to be turned on

We're talking a 65% attack on the web here

Sure nothing is unbreakable, but nobody's gonna torrent random YouTube videos, so the capacity to make the experience unbearable is there

Rob100 ,
@Rob100@sakurajima.moe avatar

@arstechnica pff, just use Peertube on Newpipe.

infosec812 ,
@infosec812@foojay.social avatar

@arstechnica
And I do, but they still monetize my viewing habits and sell my personal information to advertisers, so tell me why I should continue?

dcemc ,
@dcemc@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica if YouTube had a $4.99 plan with no ads, they wouldn’t have this problem

bytebro ,
@bytebro@mastodonapp.uk avatar

@arstechnica Yup. And with one browser choice (out of the box - no reconfiguring) plus one ad-blocker extension, I never see them anyway. No idea what people are so stressed about :)

apemantus ,
@apemantus@ieji.de avatar

@arstechnica Content makers and influencers will stay where the big money is, just like it was with reddit, twitter. Let them enjoy each other.

JakeHarrison ,
@JakeHarrison@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica This can't be legal

lina ,
@lina@uwu.social avatar

@arstechnica piped+libretube my beloved
Alsooo newpipe is the best that allows all of this to work🩷🩷🩷🩷

dozymoe ,
@dozymoe@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica AI investment taking its toll

RassilonianLegate ,
@RassilonianLegate@mstdn.social avatar

@arstechnica
It's stuff like this that garuntees I'm never even considering YouTube premium

TheDarcBird ,
@TheDarcBird@vivaldi.net avatar

@arstechnica
There's always UBO U-Block Origin. Whenever YouTuber finds a way to block them they find a way around it.

cynblogger ,
@cynblogger@sfba.social avatar

@arstechnica
YouTube Premium is absolutely worth the price, IMO.
No ads EVER…
Unlimited music…

etua_en ,
@etua_en@ieji.de avatar

@arstechnica Curious if within 5 years we'll see the news about browsers being limited to 1080p and everything above available only in proprietary client. For the sake of the user experience, of course.
Everything can happen in mobile-first world.

brent ,
@brent@thecanadian.social avatar

@arstechnica I would pay for YouTube premium if it wasn't bundled with their music service, which I do not need. Monopolistic practise.

etua_en ,
@etua_en@ieji.de avatar

@arstechnica Curious if within 5 years we'll see the news about browsers being limited to 1080p and everything above available only in proprietary client. For the sake of the user experience, of course.
Everything can happen in mobile-first world.

judah ,
@judah@mas.to avatar

@arstechnica

If the video can be viewed, the video can be downloaded and disseminated. Can't Stop The Signal Mal.

RolloTreadway ,
@RolloTreadway@beige.party avatar

@arstechnica This is probably a good time to point out that @libretube is an entirely free way to watch youtube videos without ads and trackers and all that crap.

devans143 ,
@devans143@phpc.social avatar

@arstechnica Yeah... That is NOT going to happen. I am down to 1 or 2 use cases (channels) I check on, usually related to SpaceX. Otherwise I am avoiding YouTube (or working around their AD Block blocking).

staringatclouds ,
@staringatclouds@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Google can get fucked

Kierkegaanks ,
@Kierkegaanks@beige.party avatar

@arstechnica Youtube should be nationalized

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines