arstechnica ,
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

OpenAI’s CriticGPT outperforms humans in catching AI-generated code bugs

Research model catches bugs in AI-generated code, improving human oversight of AI.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/06/openais-criticgpt-outperforms-humans-in-catching-ai-generated-code-bugs/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

freevolt24 ,
@freevolt24@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica coding is the easiest part of development....

kevin ,
@kevin@dice.camp avatar

@arstechnica "OpenAI’s CriticGPT outperforms humans in catching AI-generated code bugs". Contemplate the ridiculousness of this.

TestUser42 ,

@arstechnica another solution they want to sell us, for the problem they created themselves

liquor_american ,
@liquor_american@universeodon.com avatar
thespiralcow ,
@thespiralcow@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica Mostly because it's the cause of so many code bugs. Please, let's just ban AI. Nothing good comes of it. Nothing.

malin ,
@malin@dice.camp avatar

@arstechnica
@Computer - someone is trying to put humans in charge of AI. Are humans allowed to do that?

analog_cafe ,
@analog_cafe@mas.to avatar

@arstechnica can't a compiler made in the 1970s catch bugs better than humans by failing to compile?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines