observantTrapezium ,
@observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca avatar

It’s interesting, but I don’t think viewing order has to be chronological. If someone is adamant about watching everything, I’d recommend they go by production order.

GenderNeutralBro ,

This is true for pretty much any franchise. If you’re going to watch it all, you can’t go wrong with release order. That way you have the same context that original viewers did, and what the writers likely had in mind.

That doesn’t mean TOS the best starting point for newcomers, though, since they’re probably not committed to thousands of hours of Trek right out of the gate. They’re gonna bail if they don’t like the first few episodes they watch.

Cagi , (edited )

A golden oldie that keeps on updating: …blogspot.com/…/and-now-conclusion.html

solitaire ,
@solitaire@infosec.pub avatar

I love the website layout so much lmao

mipadaitu ,

Since I don’t see it mentioned anywhere, it looks like the abbreviation ST is for the Short Treks.

Corgana ,
@Corgana@startrek.website avatar

Y’know, part of me hopes they never explain “Calypso” and just let it persist as this weird mystery.

solitaire ,
@solitaire@infosec.pub avatar

It’s neat but chronological seems like a psychotic way for someone new to Star Trek to get into it lol

ENT then STD, yikes.

jmcs ,

I agree it’s bad if it’s the first time you’ve watching Star Trek. But it’s a reasonable experience if you are watching it for the second time though.

Corgana ,
@Corgana@startrek.website avatar

*DSC or DIS

solitaire ,
@solitaire@infosec.pub avatar

nah

Corgana ,
@Corgana@startrek.website avatar

https://media.tenor.com/kcAzGWJBC8cAAAAC/eyeroll-star-trek.gif

dasJot ,

MBS! It’s the Michael Burnham Show!

Grayox ,
@Grayox@lemmy.ml avatar

Currently watching it in chronological order with my partner for the 1st time, just got to season 4 of ENT, shit is getting crazy in the Temporal Wars.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • random
  • [email protected]
  • All magazines
    •