Madison420

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Madison420 ,

If you're driving more than 300miles a day you're just admitting your a much larger slice of the shitty pie.

Madison420 ,

Maybe don't do that? Catch a train it's significantly cheaper anyway.

Madison420 ,

But much better for the environment, sometimes others matter more and when more people use rail it's more likely our country will catch up and build hyper train networks.

Madison420 ,

That just isn't true, you just said you could ride a train. You choose not to, that's a big difference.

But saying rail is significantly slower you narrow your nationality to maybe 5 major nations one happens to be significantly more represented on Lemmy. The "need" to drive safe over reaction to the guess means I'm almost certainly correct. Am I not?

Madison420 ,

There absolutely is, the fact that most other major countries get 6 weeks mandatory minimum and we have zero mandatory minimum is crazy.

Madison420 ,

An optional "profession" that steals money from qualified taxis and is also super abusive towards its employees. That's not an excuse, that's an explanation an kinda of a bad one at that.

Madison420 ,

That's an infrastructure problem you can help solve and regardless going on long trips for most people is 100% optional.

Madison420 ,

Short range point to point trucking (day trucking) is necessary, pretty much any other truckload is better taken by rail both faster and cheaper in countries other than the US because oil companies didn't intentionally kneecap American rail.

Madison420 ,

That's literally what it does. Taxis didn't have monopoly, they have a licensed job specifically because unlicensed taxis were dangerous and people at the time were getting shanghaied.

Madison420 ,

Radio is licensed to transmit at certain levels on certain frequencies, Spotify does not transmit in open air.

Point to where I said it was happening. I said taxis were licensed because of crazy shit like rapists driving people to word places and having at. You don't get that with Uber.

Madison420 ,

It is, no one checks to see if your driver is a multiple murderer, serial rapist and yes for reference incidents of rape from unlicensed taxis such as Uber and Lyft and much much higher than with medallioned taxis.

https://mckaylawtx.com/exploring-the-alarming-statistics-on-sexual-assault-in-uber-passengers/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/10/21/tech/lyft-safety-transparency-report-sexual-assault

Madison420 ,

You don't really want water holding inside of the breeze lock, you want it to drain and dry out or the brick will rot inside to out and instead of a pinhole you have a bowling ball, it'll just take longer to happen.

Madison420 ,

You know aside from all the evidence historically otherwise.

Nikki Haley walks back Civil War comments after backlash ( www.cbsnews.com )

Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley is facing backlash after she was asked on Wednesday what caused the Civil War and failed to include slavery in her answer, instead saying the conflict was about state's rights. On Thursday, she attempted to walk back the comments, saying that slavery was an "unquestioned" aspect of...

Madison420 ,

I mean no, they’re not wrong it is about states rights in relation to owning people, it can be both and also a interstate b trade dispute which is why they wanted the federal government to step in.

Essentially “we’re losing in trade to x because slaves are running to x so they can be free” and then they asked the federal government to step in and say slaves that escaped to the States should still be seen as property and not granted freedom. The federal government took no stance and are largely at fault by inactivity.

Madison420 ,

Well no again, they saw it as a states rights thing on their end and an encroachment on those rights by neighboring free states. Sure, the feds did indeed make trivial attempts to squash the issue but tried to take a idiotic middle ground of appeasement when it should have been a military march into the slave holding states and an occupation thereof.

It’s a trade dispute, the trade is just morally wrong.

Madison420 ,

They see it as the primary reason they just veil it with pleasantries because it’s hard to deal with the fact that their forefathers were unequivocally racists, traitors and general bigots.

Madison420 ,

I never said racism makes sense nor racists for that matter. What they believe and what is logical to believe clearly don’t match up so why are you trying to make the illogical logical.

Madison420 ,

If I were a tardigrade I’d move out from home || Why live in the shrubbery when you could have a throne? || Pressure wouldn’t squash me and fire couldn’t burn. || These are the things that I never will learn. ||

youtu.be/aCkSr0ugTIM?si=bjoS0qjTDXqMi9bq

Madison420 ,

Dank, hope the thief gets charged.

Madison420 ,

It was stolen, the locker likely had a name associated at some point, that’s a Clue the rest is up to investigation.

So yes I read it but I can also do math and understand grand theft investigations given it’s value is likely tens of thousands.

Madison420 , (edited )

If they want it or not fans will do it anyway, it’s in their best interest to get the police involved so fans meddling are committing obstruction.

Maybe? We don’t know that’s the point of investigation. Dude stole history and should be punished for it, why are you implying a theft over time is absolved?

Ed: should I point out that knowingly keeping stolen property is a crime as well so whomever has it right now is commiting a new and fun crime unless they immediately get into contact with the Roddenberry’s.

Madison420 ,

The Roddenberry’s as in the family or foundation. You act like it’s an incomplete sentence and it isn’t.

Madison420 , (edited )

Sure, roddennberry lent it to the motion picture set guys and it was never returned even with gene asking for it directly. No 0 one misplaces ≈50lbs of wood that’s 3ft long and has specific storage requirements.

Historians, like model-maker David Shaw, who wrote a detailed history of the lost 3-foot model, believe that for at least a time, the model sat on Roddenberry’s desk and was his property. They believe Roddenberry loaned it to people working on the production of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, but it was never returned. There is even a record of Roddenberry writing to contacts at the production house inquiring to get it back to no avail.

www.google.com/amp/s/arstechnica.com/…/amp/

Ed: off work. And yes it was actually reported stolen.

therpf.com/…/red-alert-lost-3-ft-tos-enterprise-f…

Ed: estimated value given current sales of available studio models. ≈3 million+

Madison420 ,

No. That something you can use not something you have to use especially as the value both historic and monetary goes up.

If it were a painting we wouldn’t be having this hedging conversation.

Madison420 ,

Neat.

Madison420 , (edited )

Gene is, it was built for Gene at genes direction and he continually requested it back.

It aught to be as interesting to find out how it came to be where it is as it is to the inevitable detailed inspection/investigation of the model should be.

Ed:

According to Majel Barrett-Roddenberry, “That particular ship was a real model and it *was Gene’s *– he loaned it to someone and Gene forgot to get it back and it was never returned. It’s a shame because it’s a piece of stolen property and since it has historical value – it is quite priceless.”

Ed:

redshirtsalwaysdie.com/…/has-gene-roddenberys-mis…

The model was made by prop-maker Richard Datin Jr under the direction of Star Trek series creator Gene Roddenberry in the preproduction phase of the series before it even had a full series order. It preceded an 11-foot model that was used for most of the shots in the series. However, the 3-footer was used for the opening credits sequence and all but one of the shots of the Enterprise in the series’ pilot, because the 11-foot version was not ready in time for shooting. It was also used sporadically in other shots in later episodes, including one where it actually acted as a model of the Enterprise sitting on a table.

www.google.com/amp/s/jerz.setonhill.edu/…/amp/

It was not at any time the studios, it was made for Gene before the series started.

Madison420 ,

Bingo. Someone probably just didn’t pay their bill, it’s way more common than you’d think.

Madison420 , (edited )

CCMan1701A](startrek.website/u/CCMan1701A) has a point. The model was built for production purposes, so it would have almost certainly been paid for - and therefore owned - by either by Desilu Studios or Norway Corporation (aka Norway Productions) depending on how the accounting was set up back in 1964. So unless Desilu/Norway sold or gifted the model to Roddenberry at some point, ie formally passed title to him, technically it would still be the property of the original corporate owner.

No it wasn’t, it was genes and it sat on his desk before being loaned out to the studio who did not own it hence “loan”. There is no ambiguity, the Roddenberry family has made this very very clear.

What I think quite possible though is that after TOS was cancelled Roddenberry took possession of a bunch of production assets nobody ever thought would have any value. Star Trek, after all, was a failed show. IIRC it was known that he used to do stuff like that, eg selling off merchandise to fans that - technically - he didn’t own. It’s just that nobody really cared too much back then.

No the model was made before any production, again documented and linked for source.

Now as it so happens, Norway was actually Roddenberry’s production company, but technically that doesn’t matter, as there’s a legal distinction between a corporation you own on the one hand, and you as an individual on the other. That’s the whole purpose of setting up businesses as separate legal entities. So even if the model was originally purchased by and owned by Norway (as opposed to Desilu, which was sold to Paramount during the show’s run) then Norway (Roddenberry’s company) would still have needed to pass ownership to Gene Roddenberry the individual (via a gift or sale) in order for Majel Roddenberry’s statement that “it was Gene’s” to be strictly true. Of course, that would have been a cinch to do: Roddenberry, as owner/executive of Norway, simply sells or gives the model to Roddenberry the individual.

Again, no ambiguity you’re simply spinning tales when the book is already written.

It’s possible that this happened, ie that Desilu or Norway sold or gifted the model to Roddenberry, but it’s also possible (especially if the model was owned by Desilu/Paramount) that he merely ended up with it, and that nobody questioned his legal right to it in the years since.

Again it’s documented, you’re simply making things up.

Personally, regardless of whether technically (ie from a legal or accounting perspective) Roddenberry did or did not own the model, I fully understand that Rod Roddenberry would be interested in recovering this seminal piece of Star Trek memorabilia, and I wouldn’t have any issues if it stayed in the Roddenberry family or was gifted to an institution like the Smithsonian.

It was part of genes personal property, no studio ever owned it point blank period. It wasn’t even supposed to be used in filming and only was used because the 11ft model was not complete.

Ed: www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-att-us-rv…

Madison420 ,

It was genes in 64 too. Gene paid, datin made it and by all accounts it was left with the studio until the studio Gene owned released it back to Gene for personal possession at the cancellation of tos.

Correct, the model was made preproduction, again that much is documented.

It was redesigned during production, the preproduction model is still the same model.

It was paid for by Gene and Norway as Norway presented it back to Gene commemoratively not desilu. And yet but all accounts he did.

This one is documented by the parties as at the very very very very least having been gifted to him commemoratively, no question about this model.

Again, third parties verify that the model of nothing else was absolutely genes possession having been gifted back to him as commemoration of the cancellation of tos. You shouldn’t have a problem with it, it’s theirs.

Madison420 ,

The Facebook thread is claiming the model maker for Picard says that rod got in touch with the seller and it’s on its way back to the family to be restored.

m.facebook.com/groups/…/10159422531316319

Madison420 ,

I’m a weirdo and don’t really have a preference for most of the main ships, it’s the weird one shot ships that don’t or didn’t really have story behind them that I like. So like the models destroyed for wolf 359 are closer to my heart lol.

Madison420 ,

One year from Discovery. So one year from October 31 2023 iirc.

Madison420 ,

Why are we talking about ram adjustments? The turnbuckle arm is bent because neither arm or spring unit are mounted correctly.

Madison420 ,

You can see it pulled out likely bent the arm at the same time and then someone remounted it closer to the hinges which is not good.

Madison420 ,

Me me me ow ow me me me me ow ow I’m theeeee catman me me me ow ow me me me me ow ow.

Truck purchases are driving up the average cost of car payments. Some buyers pay over $1,000 a month ( www.nbcnews.com )

More than 1 in 4 car shoppers in Texas and Wyoming have committed to paying more than $1,000 a month, and experts say it is due to the high volume of large truck purchases in those states, according to a report by auto site Edmunds....

Madison420 ,

Being higher up isn’t really safer, sorta feels that way but push come to shove a lower cg is almost always preferable.

Madison420 ,

Bingo, robber barons in the gilded age did the same shit while owning people at the same time. It’s a power thing not forethought of climate change.

Madison420 ,

A newborn he would later go onto make incestuous comments about on TV multiple times, and then bragged about buying a beauty pageant so he can watch preteens undress.

Madison420 ,

I think this probably happened the other way round. They had a separate more traditional language until they struck out and discovered other civilizations that spoke other languages. An allegorical language that can be modified with context under observation would actually be a fairly good way to relate and then exchange languages using tamarian as sort of a Rosetta stone.

Republicans try to stop military’s electrification with mind-bogglingly dumb proposals ( electrek.co )

Several Republican representatives have proposed amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act to try to stop the Pentagon’s electrification. The proposals sound so mind-bogglingly dumb that they look like they were written by 19th-century Luddites or the fossil fuel industry itself....

Madison420 ,

Fueling is also much less volatile and you can gain that electricity with cleaner means and cheaper fuels, ideally nuclear.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines