PeriodicallyPedantic

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

It’s wild that people celebrate folks sending jobs overseas as “smart business people”, but then demonize workers asking for wages to keep to with inflation as “greedy”.

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

Bleeding our economy has always been celebrated, and the people who are being bled are always demonized.

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

I think that companies shouldn’t be allowed to change wage/salary based on locale.

But I have no idea how that could be enforced.

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

The people doing the demonizing of workers are the ones praising the business owners. Although sometime they’re also business owners themselves, I was more talking about financial reporters, TV personalities, and bootlickers.

But, yes.

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

And how do you enforce the taxes?

The problem i was alluding to was shell companies, subsidiaries, and all the existing popular tax avoiding strategies used by big companies (that’d also be used for avoiding counting those employees)

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

For the record, I agree with more taxes. I’m ok with you replying more taxes.

But we need new laws in addition to new taxes, that prevent companies from splitting up their companies (money/employees) into distinct legal entities based on geographical location. Good luck with that, though.

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

Yes, but not anti temporary-migrant-workers.

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

LOL you think they wouldn’t have already done that if they could? Explain to me how you think that’d be the result of making offshore labour more expensive 🤣🤣🤣

PeriodicallyPedantic ,

More taxes

PeriodicallyPedantic OP ,

I read that article, and it’s very good! But it didn’t explain how detect atmospheric blurring, since it’s not actually blurring, it’s distortion. To quote that article

even if the sharpest image is very clear, it may still be distorted in varying degrees around the frame So you can’t just score the frames by sharpness.

Assuming all images are compared to a reference shot as you suggested, how is the reference shot selected?

I’ve actually got my own ideas about how it could be done, but this is coming from a background in computer science, not from astronomy, so I don’t trust my solution.

what is the mass of a cloud?

As the title asks, what is the average mass of each kind of cloud? Ignoring things like overcast days, and only considering clouds large enough to identify. Or maybe rather than “average” it’d be better to say “what is the mass of an archiypical cloud of each type?” Eg an archiypical cumulus, cirrus, cumulonimbus, etc.

PeriodicallyPedantic OP ,

Oh shit good question. I’m gonna say no because I was really trying to ask about how much ice/water/dust is involved, but I’m also curious about the air.

PeriodicallyPedantic OP ,

That’s true. I’m ok with either option though, the mass of the condensed water, or the total mass of water in the volume of the cloud.

PeriodicallyPedantic OP ,

I’m mostly interested in how much water is in a cloud. The mass of air is also interesting, but it isn’t what I was originally thinking when I asked

PeriodicallyPedantic OP ,

The question is a work in progress 😉 You don’t always know what you really want to ask until you start a discussion.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines