@RaePatterson@mastodon.social cover
@RaePatterson@mastodon.social avatar

RaePatterson

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

rbreich , to Random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

Tell me: how does it make sense that an entry-level federal employee is subject to more stringent ethics rules than Supreme Court justices?

RaePatterson ,
@RaePatterson@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

It makes perfect sense to an authoritarian. Some people are bound by the law but not protected by it. Other people--you know, the ones that matter--are protected by the law but not bound by it.

It is a perfect example of the actual function and application of law in a Fascist state, to keep the proles suppressed and to protect the elite.

Unless you believe all that guff about everyone being equal under the law, which your Supreme Court clearly does not.

arstechnica , to Random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Elon Musk threatens to disobey court order over banned profiles

Brazil threatens to regulate social media owned by "billionaires domiciled abroad."

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/elon-musk-threatens-to-disobey-court-order-over-banned-profiles/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

RaePatterson , (edited )
@RaePatterson@mastodon.social avatar

@arstechnica

Is it just me, or is Musk starting to look like the eldritch magick binding his decaying flesh to his stolen bones is losing its potency?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines