rbreich ,
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

Tell me: how does it make sense that an entry-level federal employee is subject to more stringent ethics rules than Supreme Court justices?

tanyatussing ,
@tanyatussing@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich No. It doesn't make sense.

allynkhine ,

@rbreich ‘cuz justice is blind, the executive is deaf and the legislative is dumb!

jwcph ,
@jwcph@helvede.net avatar

@rbreich In the (paraphrased) words of Tom Skerrit in "Alien": It makes sense, my dear, because the Company says so.

peachfront ,
@peachfront@toot.community avatar

@rbreich

there's a long-standing culture of corruption in the United States

beforewisdom ,
@beforewisdom@veganism.social avatar

@rbreich

or Trump!

He could not pass a background investigation for a security clearance.

TrueBlue4THREE ,
@TrueBlue4THREE@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich
Like with corporate corruption, different rules are applied to ones in governmental hierarchy and This too is:
Ones with Less authority and influence are scrutinized to a higher moral/ethical standard whereas the Leaders continue to coast securely on grey area ideologies that don't hold Them accountable to a higher moral/ethical standard.

ml ,
@ml@ecoevo.social avatar

@rbreich Sadly, that is exactly the same calculation that is used at University of California. So while we should hold things to a higher standard, to the extent we do not raise these questions throughout our society, it is bound to happen in the federal government as well.

jamiemccarthy ,
@jamiemccarthy@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich Stop asking rhetorical questions about “justices.”

Start saying that the Republicans on the Supreme Court are fascists who have been bought by billionaires

Jfillian ,
@Jfillian@twit.social avatar

@rbreich My retired SSA employee wife simply replied: "Yep"

davidhmccoy ,
@davidhmccoy@mastodon.world avatar

@rbreich @binaryphile

Easy one: No.

JoeTheDumber ,

@rbreich it doesn’t but it won’t be business as usual with these guys who think the law doesn’t apply to them.

BlueWaver22 ,
@BlueWaver22@genomic.social avatar

@rbreich or the GD president or presidential candidate

ArmyGirl ,
@ArmyGirl@mastodon.world avatar

@rbreich right? We had a $25 limit on gifts in the military. $25.

bamfic ,
@bamfic@autonomous.zone avatar

@rbreich I get that you're asking this as a rhetorical question, but you've been around and in government far too long to get away with feigning ignorance of how power works.

18+ fcktheworld587 ,
@fcktheworld587@social.linux.pizza avatar

@rbreich because accountability and power are inversely related

SueDiOh ,

@rbreich
The unethical GOP broke it with their unethical presidents nominating unethical judges who were then confirmed by an unethical GOP senate.

mycotropic ,
@mycotropic@beige.party avatar

@rbreich

Supreme Court Justices aren't supposed to be utter twats while random humans may or may not function just fine while also being utter twats? Something like that?

Yoshi ,
@Yoshi@toot.community avatar

@rbreich The VA employees who provide me outstanding healthcare can't accept gifts valued at more than $15. For holidays, I give them local artisan chocolates in 5 piece packs that cost under $15.

RaePatterson ,
@RaePatterson@mastodon.social avatar

@rbreich

It makes perfect sense to an authoritarian. Some people are bound by the law but not protected by it. Other people--you know, the ones that matter--are protected by the law but not bound by it.

It is a perfect example of the actual function and application of law in a Fascist state, to keep the proles suppressed and to protect the elite.

Unless you believe all that guff about everyone being equal under the law, which your Supreme Court clearly does not.

SallyStrange ,
@SallyStrange@eldritch.cafe avatar

@rbreich that's how hierarchies always work

markproxy ,
@markproxy@bigshoulders.city avatar

@rbreich Because freedom is a perk of power, not a human right.

xepher ,
@xepher@mementomori.social avatar

@rbreich Because, in fact, the law in the US does not apply equally to all.

But it should.

ajohms1956 ,
@ajohms1956@chattrbx.com avatar

@rbreich

Why isn't there a bigger move by Democrats to take on this corrupt and illegitimate court?

walterbobrowski ,
@walterbobrowski@flipboard.social avatar
CindyS ,
@CindyS@masto.nu avatar

@rbreich

how does it make sense that the guys flipping burgers at McDonald's is subject to more stringent ethics rules than the SCOTUS justices?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines