@Supervisor194@lemmy.world avatar

Supervisor194

@[email protected]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

Texas Takes Attacks on Austin to New Level With “Death Star” Law ( slate.com )

The goal of Death Star is simple. The deeply conservative Texas Legislature wants to effectively deny cities—the state’s large Democratic-leaning cities, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin in particular—the ability to pass local laws and regulations in eight major policy areas: agriculture, business and commerce, finance,...

Supervisor194 ,
@Supervisor194@lemmy.world avatar

Big disagree from me on that. I hated (nearly) every second of it.

That having been said, SQUEEE ENTERPRISE D

Was glorious seeing it again, even after everyone in the show shit on its design all season. That rather embodies the whole problem tbh.

Edit: I love SNW though, so there’s that.

Supervisor194 ,
@Supervisor194@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, same. He was easily my favorite character on the show, what a bad decision that was.

Anyone else out there who actually really loved Discovery's S1 style of Klingons?

I am the kind of person who enjoys “big weird” scifi like Stanisław Lem. Stories about trying to relate to and find common ground with something so alien that the prospect of even understanding is basically hopeless. Star Trek usually doesn’t do stories that, which makes sense as it often uses alien races as allegories or...

Supervisor194 , (edited )
@Supervisor194@lemmy.world avatar

No.

If STD wanted to do something different, then they should have gone 300 years into the future beyond TNG and done something different.

Since Enterprise I have hated that all the new Trek properties have been prequels. The people who are now responsible for Trek either do not trust themselves enough to come up with original ideas or (more likely) have a significant disdain for the property to begin with and don’t want to come up with original ideas, for fear of being taken for someone who might do such a thing (ie: nerds).

Thus they can push the property forward supposedly building on the ideas of others, but in order to foist the appearance of originality on everybody in the face of this, they drastically - and without explanation - alter fundamental aspects of the source material. They do this apparently not imagining there will be a backlash. The inability to imagine a backlash can only come from their own personal dislike for the source material. They either find it so goofy and ridiculous that they can’t imagine anyone else would be passionate about it - or (again, more likely) they find themselves so superior to the source material in their own minds that no matter what they do, they are certain it will be seen as an improvement. Even if it isn’t seen that way, they don’t care, again, because fucking nerds.

Klingons are a thing. Extremely well developed, lots of interesting lore. OK, so these new aliens are more scary. They’re more dangerous. They’re more like warriors. Fine. Put them on a different planet 300 years in the future and stop shitting on the past. Same thing with their stupid fucking mushroom drive hooked up to tardigrade nipples.

Edit: I feel like I should mention, I like SNW even though it’s a prequel. Look what it did: changed an alien species (the Gorn) that we really don’t know much about - smart(er)!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines